W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > February 2012

[provo] Re: PROV-ISSUE-269: involved property need to be renamed and its sup-properties need to be structured in a better manner

From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 13:05:39 +0000
Message-ID: <4F4A2E23.5000908@cs.man.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org

I forgot to specify while raising this issue that it is related to the 
ontology.

On 26/02/2012 12:57, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-269: involved property need to be renamed and its sup-properties need to be structured in a better manner
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/269
>
> Raised by: Khalid Belhajjame
> On product:
>
>
> I find the term involved not intuitive. I thought of "related", but it is not great either.
>
> Additionally, I would suggest giving more structure to the sub-properties of involved, to reflect for example the kinds of domain and range involved, e.g., entity_entity_related, agent_agent_related, entity_activity_related, and activity_activity_related. Again we need some intuitive names for the new properties that we introduce.
>
> Khalid
>
>
>
>
Received on Sunday, 26 February 2012 13:06:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:56 GMT