W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Re: prov-o team to list left hand sides of DM mapping rules

From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:29:04 +0100
Message-ID: <CAExK0DcbBw7_OkiZVrJdGYe0fs6WdmwKvzaQsF9haTo-yN9cDQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org Group" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Done.

Daniel

2012/2/10 Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>

> Thank you, Daniel.
>
> I look forward to reviewing what you've done.
>
> I know you've also created the lists
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#List_of_terms_that_are_going_to_be_modeled_in_order_to_align_PROV-O_to_WD3
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#List_of_terms_that_are_NOT_going_to_be_modeled_in_PROV-O_to_WD3__alignement
>
> Can you move each classification here down next to the rule?
>
> So, instead of saying "We won't do wasEndedBy and Account", this rule page
> will have that mentioned in each section:
>
> == Account ===
>
> DM => PROVO
>
> We will not do this mapping yet.
>
> == wasEndedBy ===
>
> DM => PROVO
>
> We will not do this mapping yet.
>
>
>
> I think it's best if we stay DM-centric so that we can stay oriented.
>
> Also, I'd like to get rid of the lists at the top when their information
> has made it to the appropriate sections.
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
>
> On Feb 10, 2012, at 10:50 AM, Daniel Garijo wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
> I've completed the left list (in order), and I've also completed the
> actedOnBehalfOf according
> to what was discussed on the mailing list.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Daniel
>
> 2012/2/10 Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
>
>> prov-o team,
>>
>> We agreed to have a complete list of "left hand sides" listed at [1] by
>> today.
>>
>> It is still incomplete.
>>
>> This is mostly a copy-paste activity. The heavy lifting comes in filling
>> in the right hand sides.
>>
>> The purpose of our goal today was to extract _all_ of the DM ASN
>> signatures so that we had a concise view of the work ahead of us.
>> I've argued before (and heard some agreement) that we maintain the order
>> of the rules to suit the original order in the DM.
>>
>> I have about 10 done, and I think someone did the Derivation.
>>
>> Can we get more eyes on copy/pasting the signatures from DM into left
>> hand sides of these rules?
>>
>> If the pattern is not obvious from the 11 rules that are already there,
>> please ask for clarification.
>>
>>
>> I will work on the list this afternoon, but won't be able to get back to
>> it until Sunday afternoon.
>>
>> Thanks for your consideration.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [1]  http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF
>>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 10 February 2012 16:29:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:56 GMT