W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:44:39 -0500
Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1043CC98-C69C-408D-A153-8AE7B7EFC73F@rpi.edu>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>

On Feb 20, 2012, at 3:44 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:

> Hi Satya
> 
> I haven't had a chance to go through Stian's revised ontology, and study it.
> So, I am only answering a few points below
>> 
> 
> See 4th bullet point in http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/#record-Generation
> Likewise, for Usage, etc.
> 


What other instantaneous things do we have besides Usage and Generation?
(the beginning and ending of Activity is the only other thing, right?)


>> 7.
>>>>> Association
>>>>> ---- adoptedPlan i would have thought it had to be functional
>>>> 
>>>> This is a PROV-O issue.
>>>> 
>>>> proposal: Raise against PROV-O.  No change is needed to the mapping.
>>>> 
>> 
>> The DM3 clearly states in Section 5.3.2.1, "An activity may be associated with multiple plans."
>> 
>> So, we are consistent with DM3.  
> 
> 4th bullet point of  5.3.2.1 indicates a single plan, for a given association.
> 
> The sentence you quote is indeed in the text, but is ambiguous. To be aligned with the 4th bullet point,
> it should be read: An activity may be associated with multiple plans, by means of multiple association records.
> 

I made adoptedPlan functional.

http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/diff/91e8f1942bc9/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl

-Tim
Received on Friday, 24 February 2012 03:45:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:56 GMT