W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Tim's approach on Involvement

From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:01:55 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPRnXtnaRRob90KrmuwT750ZjL9RvmOEF+p7CotW9dpGHMS=JQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org Group" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:46, Khalid Belhajjame
<Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote:

> We decided to model only wasStartedBy that involves an agent. So that I
> think, we can safely define Start as a sub-class of Association.

So something like in http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Starting_again ?

I'm not sure if I like this - here the involvement is both a
prov:Start and prov:Inform at the same time - and a phantom agent ?ag1
is introduced.

.. or we simply say that Starting_again is not mapped to RDF?

Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 09:02:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:12 UTC