- From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:06:23 +0000
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- CC: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Agree. the presence of ex:order is never explained anyways, and it can be inferred from the timestamps if needed. -Paolo On 2/6/12 9:36 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-241 (TLebo): remove ex:order=2 in generation example > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/241 > > Raised by: Timothy Lebo > On product: > > The attribute-value "ex:order=2" may encourage readers to model ordering outside of PROV, which seems to defeat the purpose of using prov. While they _may_ do whatever they want, I don't think we should be encouraging it in the spec itself. > > I propose replacing: > > wasGeneratedBy(e2,a1, 2001-10-26T10:00:00, [ex:port="p1", ex:order=2]) > > with: > > wasGeneratedBy(e2,a1, 2001-10-26T10:00:00, [ex:port="p1") > > Thanks, > Tim > > > -- ----------- ~oo~ -------------- Paolo Missier - Paolo.Missier@newcastle.ac.uk, pmissier@acm.org School of Computing Science, Newcastle University, UK http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/people/Paolo.Missier
Received on Monday, 6 February 2012 23:16:39 UTC