- From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:22:06 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Khalid and Tim, In the spirit of what was said today: why not xsd:dateTime? Cheers, Luc On 02/02/2012 11:27, Khalid Belhajjame wrote: > > Yes, agreed as a first step. > We also need to follow what's happening in the RDF working group as > Ivan seems to hints that there are people working on that in that > working group. > > Khalid > > On 02/02/2012 08:52, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 08:44, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker >> <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: >>> PROV-ISSUE-231 (TLebo): Remove owl:Time from prov-o [Ontology] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/231 >> As a first transition, we can change the current time:Instant etc. to >> just prov:Instant. They are already verbatim in the OWL, copied from >> time.owl (to avoid owl:import) >> >> >> (I feel it's sad that the OWL Time ontology was never completed to a >> standard, as it's quite well made!) >> >> > >
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2012 22:24:04 UTC