W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Re: prov-o team to list left hand sides of DM mapping rules

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:41:56 -0500
Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org Group" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <D6C1BC49-9436-4F57-B817-69E8784C8D1F@rpi.edu>
To: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
Thanks, Daniel!

I'll dig in later this afternoon.

Could the rest of the prov-o team sign http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Mapping_coverage
after they've reviewed the list?

Also, please feel free to take a stab at right hands, or make notes under each rule.

Thanks,
Tim



On Feb 10, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Daniel Garijo wrote:

> Done.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 2012/2/10 Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
> Thank you, Daniel.
> 
> I look forward to reviewing what you've done.
> 
> I know you've also created the lists
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#List_of_terms_that_are_going_to_be_modeled_in_order_to_align_PROV-O_to_WD3
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#List_of_terms_that_are_NOT_going_to_be_modeled_in_PROV-O_to_WD3__alignement
> 
> Can you move each classification here down next to the rule?
> 
> So, instead of saying "We won't do wasEndedBy and Account", this rule page will have that mentioned in each section:
> 
> == Account ===
> 
> DM => PROVO
> 
> We will not do this mapping yet.
> 
> == wasEndedBy ===
> 
> DM => PROVO
> 
> We will not do this mapping yet.
> 
> 
> 
> I think it's best if we stay DM-centric so that we can stay oriented.
> 
> Also, I'd like to get rid of the lists at the top when their information has made it to the appropriate sections.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim
> 
> 
> On Feb 10, 2012, at 10:50 AM, Daniel Garijo wrote:
> 
>> Hi Tim,
>> I've completed the left list (in order), and I've also completed the actedOnBehalfOf according
>> to what was discussed on the mailing list.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Daniel
>> 
>> 2012/2/10 Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
>> prov-o team,
>> 
>> We agreed to have a complete list of "left hand sides" listed at [1] by today.
>> 
>> It is still incomplete.
>> 
>> This is mostly a copy-paste activity. The heavy lifting comes in filling in the right hand sides.
>> 
>> The purpose of our goal today was to extract _all_ of the DM ASN signatures so that we had a concise view of the work ahead of us.
>> I've argued before (and heard some agreement) that we maintain the order of the rules to suit the original order in the DM.
>> 
>> I have about 10 done, and I think someone did the Derivation.
>> 
>> Can we get more eyes on copy/pasting the signatures from DM into left hand sides of these rules?
>> 
>> If the pattern is not obvious from the 11 rules that are already there, please ask for clarification.
>> 
>> 
>> I will work on the list this afternoon, but won't be able to get back to it until Sunday afternoon.
>> 
>> Thanks for your consideration.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> [1]  http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF
>> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 10 February 2012 16:55:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:56 GMT