www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org from October 2001 by thread

Amplie suas vendas 111netcon@ieg.com.br (Wednesday, 31 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> comercial (Wednesday, 31 October)

Choose 3 Free Lipsticks Offer - While Supplies Last Shop@Manna (Wednesday, 31 October)

http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-patent-policy-20010816/ Bob Dewey (Wednesday, 31 October)

cool link rixo@mail.de (Tuesday, 30 October)

21世紀超勁爆生涯講座 taipei7@yam.com (Tuesday, 30 October)

Summary of 25 October 2001 Patent Policy WG Teleconference Susan Lesch (Tuesday, 30 October)

Summary of 15-17 October 2001 Patent Policy WG Face-to-Face meeting available Daniel Weitzner (Tuesday, 30 October)

Stop Paying For Porn! Join 4 Free Is Here! 27285338 Join4FreeFrenzy@J4F.com (Tuesday, 30 October)

I oppose the use of patented technology in w3c standards Michael Crawford (Monday, 29 October)

Employment / HR solution Sara@w3.org (Monday, 29 October)

Employment / HR solution Sara@w3.org (Monday, 29 October)

Patent Policy Todd Weiler (Monday, 29 October)

SVENSKA WAYPOINT SIDAN reveal@bredband.net (Monday, 29 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> viktor@hot.ee (Monday, 29 October)

Protect your family from cell phone radiation Warning@sar-shield.com (Monday, 29 October)

From: DBBROADCAST DBBROADCAST (Sunday, 28 October)

Marketing is the LIFEBLOOD of your Business AYNOC InternetSales7@excite.com (Sunday, 28 October)

Need a Home Loan? Let Us Help! Kevin Anderson (Saturday, 27 October)

Your Engineering web site is NOT Being SEEN! Important Message! (Saturday, 27 October)

Pre-Approved $5000 Platinum Credit Card ! credit@new-credit-report.com (Friday, 26 October)

PATO: Collective Security In the Age of Software Patents Mark Bucciarelli (Friday, 26 October)

NO, NO, NO! 0liv (Friday, 26 October)

Vous vendez des vhicules mailing (Friday, 26 October)

私生活観察マニュアルとは・・・ adulty@nozo.kk.jp (Friday, 26 October)

hi :o) Linda A. Langden (Friday, 26 October)

Hey, check this out! QB Challenge (Thursday, 25 October)

MSN blocks non-IE browsers: the real idea with RAND "standards" Martijn Dekker (Thursday, 25 October)

WEB infrastructure and RAND Lowell Harris (Thursday, 25 October)

企業可應用NETSCREEN防火牆建置網路安全連線環境,並使不同服務享受不同頻寬,有效利用ADSL寬頻達成企業虛擬網路連線. ~T@w3.org (Thursday, 25 October)

supply silicon metal and magnesium ingots sales@globalsilicon.com (Thursday, 25 October)

Mortgage Leads Available! disk343@excite.com (Thursday, 25 October)

Why I have not spoken personally about the patent policy issue Tim Berners-Lee (Wednesday, 24 October)

What is "reasonable" anyway? Federico Heinz (Wednesday, 24 October)

Play a hilarious prank call Computerised Prank Calls (Wednesday, 24 October)

W3C - Self examination time! Blake Courtney (Wednesday, 24 October)

MARKETING MF (Tuesday, 23 October)

Talking Hand Held Dictionary Translator... Language Teacher, Inc. (Tuesday, 23 October)

I Oppose the proposed Patent Policy Framework, dated August 16, 2001 Lynn Walton (Tuesday, 23 October)

Quality conferencing at a low cost longdistance@repia.com (Monday, 22 October)

ȭ ġ ~~~ nike@nike.com (Monday, 22 October)

Fwd: Play a hilarious prank call Brian Fletcher (Sunday, 21 October)

Make some extra money using the internet RussSend@aol.com (Sunday, 21 October)

I don't like it 依瑪貓 (Sunday, 21 October)

Centro de Rehabilitacin mental y tratamiento de adicciones. Arlana (Saturday, 20 October)

Make A Chunk Of Money Excel In Life (Friday, 19 October)

Start a home business boudha@abacom.com (Friday, 19 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Godefroid Chapelle (Friday, 19 October)

RAND patents Dan Devine (Friday, 19 October)

UK WEBCAM LIST Darron Callender (Thursday, 18 October)

[홍보]유학가격★폭격쎄일★누구나 갈수있는기회!도전하세요!! Youn, Roy (Thursday, 18 October)

W3C position on patents / business methods John Skelton (Thursday, 18 October)

No To The Patent Policy Joe Morris (Thursday, 18 October)

NO TO RAND (even after 11 October!) tim bacon (Thursday, 18 October)

**SPECIAL**COMPUTER MEMORY memorytogo@memorytogo4.com (Thursday, 18 October)

patent logic S. Vikram (Thursday, 18 October)

patent logic S. Vikram (Thursday, 18 October)

Make A Chunk Of Money Excel In Life (Thursday, 18 October)

Against fees Robert Hooton (Wednesday, 3 October)

Hello, your friend recommended openxxx.net to you friendz@openxxx.net (Monday, 15 October)

XenoFORM XenoFORM team. (Wednesday, 17 October)

Make A Chunk Of Money Make Money Fast (Wednesday, 17 October)

Patent Policy Framework draft L D (Wednesday, 17 October)

Software development / ref:1603 Info (Wednesday, 17 October)

advice 20 morganmarino241@yahoo.com (Wednesday, 17 October)

Standards are to be STANDARD by Definition Warren Puckett (Wednesday, 17 October)

Patent Policy for WWW Standards Troy W. (Wednesday, 17 October)

Incorruptible.com News News@incorruptible.com (Tuesday, 16 October)

!!! ludmila (Wednesday, 17 October)

As suggested in the GNU WEB site.. BODRATO Stefano (Tuesday, 16 October)

Patents Anders (Tuesday, 16 October)

Another boring standard letter which I copied and pasted off the EFF site. Adrian Hesketh (Tuesday, 16 October)

Read your profile.......... :) Mystic Realms (Tuesday, 16 October)

Mike wanted you to read this. Jim (Tuesday, 16 October)

Patent Policy Working Group] stalbert (Monday, 15 October)

Indikator vashego uspeha!!! ludmila (Tuesday, 16 October)

Hello, your friend recommended openxxx.net to you friendz@openxxx.net (Monday, 15 October)

W3C Patent Policy Framework Eric Backus (Sunday, 7 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Nobody (Monday, 15 October)

Make Some Money Excel In Life (Monday, 15 October)

Re: Apple comments on the W3C's proposal Simon Brooke (Monday, 15 October)

Science-based design and development Andrey Golokhvastov (Monday, 15 October)

Maximum Email Profits! David Scott (Internet Marketing Expert) (Monday, 15 October)

Anthrax... No, it's NOT a computer virus! Family Survival News (Sunday, 14 October)

Patent Policy Framework Marina Brown (Sunday, 14 October)

Earn $50,000 or more in 90 days Chriss@incorruptible.com (Sunday, 14 October)

New Patriotic American Bald Eagle Screen Saver - Free shareware version available for download - Newsletter mz John Herron - Eagle Stock Images (Sunday, 14 October)

Hello, your friend recommended openxxx.net to you friends@openxxx.net (Sunday, 14 October)

Recent Patent Policy Framework Draft Baba Kofi Weusijana (Sunday, 14 October)

(Resend) RAND at W3C would reinforce global inequity Rick Jelliffe (Sunday, 14 October)

triggerhappytv butlerboys@cwctv.net (Sunday, 14 October)

Hello, your friend recommended openxxx to you friends@openxxx.net (Saturday, 13 October)

RAND Ivan Thomson (Saturday, 13 October)

don't think so allen lackey (Saturday, 13 October)

what a sham jeff lackey (Saturday, 13 October)

Make A Little Money Excel In Life (Saturday, 13 October)

image damage, legitimacy of w3c endangered barbapapa (Saturday, 13 October)

Patents = Web only for the RICH john-paul delaney (Saturday, 13 October)

WWW.ZELDMAN.COM Vanessa Lintner (Saturday, 13 October)

web standards should NOT be patented ! Alexander Sirotkin (Saturday, 13 October)

Your free listing @ JabbasPalace.com Jabba@JabbasPalace.com (Saturday, 13 October)

Against the new patent policy. Simon White (Friday, 12 October)

Next steps in W3C Patent Policy process Daniel J. Weitzner (Friday, 12 October)

"AGAINST INSANE RAND POLICY" M Mamoun (Friday, 12 October)

The Social/Political Role of the W3C Brad Herman (Friday, 12 October)

Web standards, W3C and others. derek lane (Friday, 12 October)

Another $0.02 against. Michael Burford (GetRight) (Friday, 12 October)

THIS IS AN AWFUL IDEA LoreWeaver (Friday, 12 October)

No patents or license rights on the web! Jack Martinez (Friday, 12 October)

Patent policy comment hogarth (Friday, 12 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> John Taylor (Friday, 12 October)

www-patentpolicy-comment Randolph Vail (Friday, 12 October)

Patents and standards El-Gayar, Omar (Friday, 12 October)

RAND rdean71@cs.com (Friday, 12 October)

ACTIVADORES BIOLGICOS PARA ELIMINAR OLORES. PUBLICIDAD! !PUBLICIDAD (Friday, 12 October)

I realize this is a bit late... Seairth Jacobs (Friday, 12 October)

RAND IS BAD John Dooley Road Runner (Friday, 12 October)

PC FLORIPA Informtica - Tudo para seu computador PC FLORIPA Informtica (Friday, 12 October)

Don't do it ! Jean-Yves Delort (Friday, 12 October)

Protect your life ! protect@life-protect.com (Friday, 12 October)

Plese, no RAND!! Marco Maggesi (Friday, 12 October)

10 8 14:00ÿ ߴٴϱ.. ^^v top (Friday, 12 October)

Protect yourself ! info@life-protect.com (Friday, 12 October)

RAND Comments August Zajonc (Friday, 12 October)

asda nepp@df.copm (Friday, 12 October)

asda nepp@df.copm (Friday, 12 October)

Opinion Dominic Ringuet (Friday, 12 October)

Protect yourself ! info@life-protect.com (Friday, 12 October)

Vague definitions involve a vague future. Edward Champion (Friday, 12 October)

Opinion on Patent Policy Framework Working Draft M Birch (Friday, 12 October)

Meta4z.com Website Giveaway! will (Friday, 12 October)

Additional thoughts against RAND (long, rambling, possibly incoherent) Tony Sellers (Friday, 12 October)

Additional thoughts against RAND (short) Tony Sellers (Friday, 12 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Tim Bray (Friday, 12 October)

RF-only is much better Anant Sahai (Friday, 12 October)

Policy is self-contradictory and could sideline W3C Mark Shewmaker (Friday, 12 October)

What are you, idiots? Jorey Bump (Friday, 12 October)

RAND vs Universal Access; many other loopholes Neal McBurnett (Friday, 12 October)

I'm opposed to the "reasonable and non-discriminatory" (RAND) licensing option John White (Friday, 12 October)

Electronic Frontier Foundation comments Seth David Schoen (Friday, 12 October)

Opposition to RAND Patent Policy Amit Sahai (Friday, 12 October)

Comment on W3C's proposed (RAND) Patent Policy John L. Males (Friday, 12 October)

New T-shirts screenprints with original art Forrest Bass (Friday, 12 October)

Reject the Patent Policy Framework. Brock Frazier (Friday, 12 October)

On the W3C and Openness... Joe Crawford (Friday, 12 October)

Protect yourself ! info@life-protect.com (Friday, 12 October)

Attn: the W3C Jason Antony (Friday, 12 October)

SchemaSoft comments on 16 Aug 2001 W3C Patent Policy Framework Philip Mansfield (Friday, 12 October)

Protect yourself ! info@life-protect.com (Friday, 12 October)

Love of w3c vs. Devotion to free software tom@croft.tc (Thursday, 11 October)

Uselicensing in W3C standards Mike McCune (Thursday, 11 October)

Re: HP's Proposal for Royalty Free W3C Standards BELL,JIM (HP-Cupertino,ex6) (Thursday, 11 October)

Recall: Re: HP's Proposal for Royalty Free W3C Standards BELL,JIM (HP-Cupertino,ex6) (Thursday, 11 October)

Re: HP's Proposal for Royalty Free W3C Standards BELL,JIM (HP-Cupertino,ex6) (Thursday, 11 October)

SoftQuad Software's comments on the patent policy Lauren Wood (Thursday, 11 October)

RAND Jon Snader (Thursday, 11 October)

Patent Policy Framework draft and RAND weston (Thursday, 11 October)

seed corn William Loughborough (Thursday, 11 October)

NO royalty on WWW Seung Hyun Kim (Thursday, 11 October)

Patent is not standard 서돈키호테 (Thursday, 11 October)

an extraordinarily bad idea Matthew Walker (Thursday, 11 October)

A Comment on the Proposed Patent Policy and the ensuing controversy (reformatted) Paul Levy (Thursday, 11 October)

XenoFORM XenoFORM team. (Thursday, 11 October)

Patent Policy Disaster Tex Horning (Thursday, 11 October)

Royalty-free patents only, please Allen Smith (Thursday, 11 October)

Apple Computer's Statement on the Draft W3C Patent Policy Wanda Cox (Thursday, 11 October)

A Comment on the Proposed Patent Policy and the ensuing controversy Paul Levy (Thursday, 11 October)

Patent Policy Gregory Catalone (Thursday, 11 October)

Oppose Patents Mark Bartlett (Thursday, 11 October)

RAND Proposals Alex Hogarth (Thursday, 11 October)

Comments Patrick Chapman (Thursday, 11 October)

RAND considered harmful rand.w3c@bernard-hugueney.org (Thursday, 11 October)

Iper1 per l'e-commerce blumoda@tiscalinet.it (Thursday, 11 October)

Meta4z.com Website Giveaway! will (Thursday, 11 October)

Patent Policy Mark Maloney (Thursday, 11 October)

Contribution to W3C consultation Charles Stewart (Thursday, 11 October)

Patent Policy Draft nucleus (Thursday, 11 October)

Future High Level Functionality Mark Johnson (Thursday, 11 October)

Patent Policy Feedback Phillip Fox (Thursday, 11 October)

Last day of comments, nothing changed Daniel Phillips (Thursday, 11 October)

PATENTS & THE WORLD WIDE WEB Jonathan Bullen (Thursday, 11 October)

NO! Ryan Guenther (Thursday, 11 October)

RAND bad, RF Good R. Steven Rainwater (Thursday, 11 October)

About the patent policy in W3C web standards Luca Saiu (Thursday, 11 October)

Proposed RAND Licensing arrangements Wally Pratt (Thursday, 11 October)

Fatal Weaknesses of the Patent Disclosure Rules: and the Unocal P atent Debacle Peter DiMauro (Thursday, 11 October)

Patent Policy Framework draft Nancy Massey (Thursday, 11 October)

"RAND" policy Steve Summit (Thursday, 11 October)

Request for feedback. David Woodhouse (Thursday, 11 October)

Anasil - software network analyzer Anasil (Thursday, 11 October)

Hi from Nick of 6 ,fuller ave newdynamic (Thursday, 11 October)

Comments on the W3C Patent Policy Framework Michel Debar (Thursday, 11 October)

patent policy Tarun Ramakrishna Elankath (Thursday, 11 October)

Proposed RAND licensing arrangements Mike Brodbelt (Thursday, 11 October)

patents on the web Oz Barron (Thursday, 11 October)

Opposition to RAND Proposal Glenn Elliott (Thursday, 11 October)

Patent Policy Framework draft Svein Pedersen (Thursday, 11 October)

Patented Internet standards are wrong John Hansknecht (Thursday, 11 October)

Don't drown the spirit of generosity. Rory Ewins (Thursday, 11 October)

Concerned about patent policy Bradley M. Kuhn (Wednesday, 10 October)

standards require RF Gemeinnutz@LuftHans.com (Thursday, 11 October)

W3C Patent Policy Claire Hitchfield (Thursday, 11 October)

What he said Stuart Robertson (Thursday, 11 October)

Setting Standards for the On-line Community Tom Worthington (Thursday, 11 October)

Listen to OSI and Mozilla Tore Ferner (Thursday, 11 October)

The Web is not just for business Chris Rimmer (Thursday, 11 October)

My objection to Patent of Internet standards Scottie \ (Thursday, 11 October)

Comments of Patent policy Marc (Thursday, 11 October)

comments Mark Ellis (Thursday, 11 October)

Cadastro 944411@yahoo.com (Thursday, 11 October)

comments on patent policy Mark Ellis (Thursday, 11 October)

Patent policy comment Alisdair Odd (Thursday, 11 October)

Freedom is essential for Innovation Ajeet P Velankar (Thursday, 11 October)

RAND Proposal Jeff Herrin (Thursday, 11 October)

Thanks Jim Conway (Thursday, 11 October)

Use of `RAND' patents D. Tweed (Thursday, 11 October)

RAND licencing proposal Michael Zajac (Thursday, 11 October)

Patent Policy Framework draft linukes@hushmail.com (Thursday, 11 October)

Standards should help education Rafael Calvo (Thursday, 11 October)

The general public will fight back Rodger L. Finnestead (Thursday, 11 October)

open, free standards rob@robnet.com (Thursday, 11 October)

RAND considered harmful Steven Pothier (Thursday, 11 October)

Objections to RAND Licensing Mode activities Steven W McDougall (Thursday, 11 October)

One little voice against Brett Merkey (Thursday, 11 October)

No to Unreasonable and Discriminatory Standards Rajendra Shrestha (Thursday, 11 October)

OFFER FOR HELP edward mambo (Thursday, 11 October)

Patent Policy Framework Comment sdrie (Thursday, 11 October)

what are you thinking???? Scott Staab (Thursday, 11 October)

patent policy Ben van 't Ende (Wednesday, 10 October)

New public W3 standards involving RAND licensing conditions. m.Lund (Wednesday, 10 October)

in doubt & uncertain J. van Gorkum (Wednesday, 10 October)

patent policy Joel T Schneider (Wednesday, 10 October)

opinion on patent policy krista gallagher (Wednesday, 10 October)

I Oppose RAND tony@nhfpl.org (Wednesday, 10 October)

"RAND" policy Don (Wednesday, 10 October)

Opera Software's postion Håkon Wium Lie (Wednesday, 10 October)

Support Open Web Standards Greg Kise (Wednesday, 10 October)

Apple's RAND licensing, prior art, and the W3C process Neil Harris (Wednesday, 10 October)

Re: www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org ccooke@indigo.ie (Wednesday, 10 October)

Patent Policy Comment / Objecting to RAND psevetson@netscape.net (Wednesday, 10 October)

Subject: "NO" TO RAND LICENSING Bruce Lunde (Wednesday, 10 October)

Just say no Chip Mefford (Wednesday, 10 October)

Policy Valden Longhurst (Wednesday, 10 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Roozbeh Pournader (Wednesday, 10 October)

Keep the web open and alive Dr. Michael Evans (Wednesday, 10 October)

WWW Patent Policy makes same mistake as dead dot-coms Joseph Wang (Wednesday, 10 October)

Patent policy Richard Walker (Wednesday, 10 October)

Patents = Friction John Medcalf (Wednesday, 10 October)

RAND direction proposal Alexander Stohr (Wednesday, 10 October)

petition dpytlewski@idea.net.pl (Wednesday, 10 October)

Comments on draft Patent Policy Framework Joycelyn Maddux (Wednesday, 10 October)

Proposed patent policy Greg Ward (Wednesday, 10 October)

Patent Policy comment Jason L. Gohlke (Wednesday, 10 October)

Suggestions for alternative procedure David Balch (Wednesday, 10 October)

RAND: A Bad Thing Peter H. (Wednesday, 10 October)

Patents rick@dimensionsinteractive.com (Wednesday, 10 October)

Don't put your hands in my pourse !!! Nazar (Wednesday, 10 October)

Branded/Private Label Realtime Internet Travel Booking Engine in Eleven Languages John Hazlewood (Wednesday, 10 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Ben Wrighton - Wapdesign (Wednesday, 10 October)

open source is open mind Trahojen (Wednesday, 10 October)

Risks to content (digital rights management) in proposed framework Andy Oram (Wednesday, 10 October)

Doing a PhD? Mark Coppel (Wednesday, 10 October)

Applause Glenn Randers-Pehrson (Wednesday, 10 October)

Patent Policy Mark Plowman (Wednesday, 10 October)

500 billion not enough for MS? Jsphrsa@aol.com (Wednesday, 10 October)

Patent Policy Framework draft Jens Laland (Wednesday, 10 October)

This is not a good idea Lars Nielsen Lind (Wednesday, 10 October)

Comments on the proposal Paul Pathiakis (Wednesday, 10 October)

Comments on the proposal James Green (Wednesday, 10 October)

No to RAND David Wright (Wednesday, 10 October)

My disquiet at RAND licenses Rajnish Bhaskar (Wednesday, 10 October)

wealthocracy corrupting meritocracy - funding strategy proposal Tom Cowap (Wednesday, 10 October)

Request to extend public comment period Jason Antony (Wednesday, 10 October)

Re: Mozilla.org response to the W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Jozef Halbersztadt (Wednesday, 10 October)

Request to extend public comment period Jason Antony (Wednesday, 10 October)

New Friends From Bermuda!? Bermuda Seek (Wednesday, 10 October)

I reject a proprietary W3C pressio main (Wednesday, 10 October)

Since when is the web for sale? Bea Fontaine (Wednesday, 10 October)

Response to the W3C Patent Policy Framework Policy Draft Robin Peters (Wednesday, 10 October)

Exclusion Frank Schafer (Wednesday, 10 October)

patent policy framework draft Austin Brooks (Wednesday, 10 October)

patented protocols. Michael Mounteney (Wednesday, 10 October)

I am disappointed Martin Kutschker (Wednesday, 10 October)

W3C Patent Policy Framework michael (Wednesday, 10 October)

Web Standards NLK (Tuesday, 9 October)

Regarding recent Patent Policy Framework draft Daniel LaBell (Wednesday, 10 October)

www Power Grab Donald Kleyensteuber (Wednesday, 10 October)

No RAND in Patent Policy Framework Draft Scott Busby (Wednesday, 10 October)

Keep the WWW a free zone Philip and Shelia McArdle (Wednesday, 10 October)

Say It Ain't So, Joe Patricia West (Wednesday, 10 October)

No to RAND licensing Carl Douglas (Wednesday, 10 October)

Comments on RAND in three sections Steven Healey (Wednesday, 10 October)

Mozilla.org response to the W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Christopher Blizzard (Wednesday, 10 October)

Looking for Mortgage Leads??? -racbflg thunderbird@jufuceyj.yahoo.com (Thursday, 11 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Roberto Schulz (Wednesday, 10 October)

Additional comments to W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Evelio Perez-Albuerne (Wednesday, 10 October)

About Your Resource webmaster@axxxhome.com (Wednesday, 10 October)

Nothing to say but "no" Jose Luis Pumarega (Wednesday, 10 October)

SEXWEB NO.1 .. MEGAWEB-SEX ! EROTICAWWW (Tuesday, 9 October)

Reasons not to accept patents into standards Matthew Boulos (Tuesday, 9 October)

Comments on Patent Policy Draft matthew@toseland.f9.co.uk (Tuesday, 9 October)

RAND licensing should not be allowed Nathaniel Gray (Tuesday, 9 October)

Policy requires definitions, remedies, guarantees Jeffrey Zeldman (Tuesday, 9 October)

so...how much is Microsoft paying you? Robin Shaw (Tuesday, 9 October)

Web Patents Davi (Tuesday, 9 October)

Established Standards Eldon King (Tuesday, 9 October)

FW: RAND licensing proposal. Doug Dingus (Tuesday, 9 October)

RAND Robert Bergesch (Tuesday, 9 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> jose lorenzo (Tuesday, 9 October)

Clear Consequences Matthew C. Tedder (Wednesday, 10 October)

Publicity For Less - (Specialty Media Lists Available) PublicityWorks@netscape.net (Tuesday, 9 October)

patent-response Edward Renaud (Tuesday, 9 October)

Stay Open Paul Tichonczuk (Tuesday, 9 October)

Bookstore & Library Databases (400+ New Libraries; 175 New Age Bookstores) PublicityWorks@netscape.net (Tuesday, 9 October)

Patent Policy draft. John Hornstein (Tuesday, 9 October)

There Was Once a Vision of a Free Internet Mark Herman II (Tuesday, 9 October)

I object!! Gayle Knutson (Tuesday, 9 October)

Royalty-free (RF) is the only acceptable 'compromise' Ralph Hyre (Tuesday, 9 October)

Patent Policy Gerard Boissy (Tuesday, 9 October)

KIO Raymond Pirouz (Tuesday, 9 October)

RAND objection Bryan Montford (Tuesday, 9 October)

no patents please Loe, Steven (Tuesday, 9 October)

OSI letter of comment on W3C's proposed RAND policy Eric S. Raymond (Tuesday, 9 October)

RAND objection Mark Brader (Tuesday, 9 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Timothy Hinds (Tuesday, 9 October)

In Response To Proposed Patent Policy cbma (Tuesday, 9 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Jim Webb (Tuesday, 9 October)

Anti-Trust Issues of RAND Daniel Probst (Tuesday, 9 October)

Disappointed Steven.H.Rogers@seagate.com (Tuesday, 9 October)

RE: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public Bullard, Claude L (Len) (Tuesday, 9 October)

--- dont quite understand this eddie wilson (Tuesday, 9 October)

No, no no Cory Shubert (Tuesday, 9 October)

W3C Patent Policy Jon Slaton (Tuesday, 9 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Kai Kunze (Tuesday, 9 October)

W3C standards should be free Asle Benoni (Tuesday, 9 October)

A Case for Freedom massey (Tuesday, 9 October)

My thoughts on the Patency Policy draft Glen Scott (Tuesday, 9 October)

RAND licensing is bad Ted Wright (Tuesday, 9 October)

Please fax two copies of your promotional literature to 08717171250. phone.08717171249@fax.08717171250 (Tuesday, 9 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Madden, Francis (Tuesday, 9 October)

Thoughts on your Patent proposal Henrik Jönsson (Tuesday, 9 October)

World Wide Web Consortium - Patent Policy Working Group wendybrek@mixcom.com (Tuesday, 9 October)

Human evolution. Manos Batsis (Tuesday, 9 October)

A query about RF Jason Antony (Tuesday, 9 October)

A few more comments (this time on the specific wording of the "W3C Patent Policy Framework") Jesper Juhl (Tuesday, 9 October)

www-patentpolicy-comment James (Monday, 8 October)

Comment Voluspa (Tuesday, 9 October)

Define RAND Pat Mahoney (Tuesday, 9 October)

Comments on the W3C Patent Policy Framework Bill Zaumen (Tuesday, 9 October)

RAND: sounds like end of free web software, originator of WWW & W3C Danilo Almeida (Tuesday, 9 October)

RAND cfb@sol.usc.edu (Tuesday, 9 October)

If you feel fees must be charged, could a "sliding" scale be used steve and allana (Tuesday, 9 October)

RAND Licensing is Counterproductive Bill Gunn (Tuesday, 9 October)

Supporting software patents undermines credibility of W3C Dwayne C. Litzenberger (Tuesday, 9 October)

Proposed Patent Royalty Policy for WWW Bobgmoss@aol.com (Tuesday, 9 October)

RAND and Rolalty-Free Licensing Mode James Gartside (Tuesday, 9 October)

Patent Policy comments Bob McDonald (Tuesday, 9 October)

Not a good idea Dan Phiffer (Tuesday, 9 October)

Patent Policy gregory.d.dickson@accenture.com (Monday, 8 October)

oppose abuse of patent system to limit web free flow of information paul ih (Tuesday, 9 October)

Comments on patent Policy Cathy Gage (Tuesday, 9 October)

No Patents LMichelle (Tuesday, 9 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Oscar Zurita (Wednesday, 17 October)

Essential Claim question Noble, Lisa (Monday, 8 October)

Comments Jon Wiley (Monday, 8 October)

Open Web! John Abbe (Monday, 8 October)

comments on proposals Lisa Lorenzin (Monday, 8 October)

Eurolinux statement on W3C RAND proposal Stefane Fermigier (Monday, 8 October)

RAND licensing John Carey (Monday, 8 October)

New forums/massage-board. Please join now! this-is-the-shit (Monday, 8 October)

New forums/massage-board. Please join now! this-is-the-shit (Monday, 8 October)

please don't Joe Desbonnet (Monday, 8 October)

patent policy Daniel Webb (Monday, 8 October)

Patents are damage Steven W McDougall (Monday, 8 October)

Royalties Mariner's Loft (Monday, 8 October)

Disagreement with new Patent Policy draft Paul Erickson (Monday, 8 October)

W3C Patent Policy Framework working draft Bob Goates (Monday, 8 October)

Patent Policy Framework Rob Simmons (Monday, 8 October)

DON"T RECOMEND RAND Kyle Cranmer (Monday, 8 October)

the W3C has a virus Robert Stockmann (Monday, 8 October)

Bad Idea mplemmons@ee.net (Monday, 8 October)

Disagree with RAND license Arnaud Vaneste (Monday, 8 October)

Patent Policy draft Massimo, Tiziana e Federica (Monday, 8 October)

say NO to RAND licensing N.Oden (Monday, 8 October)

Please do not stop innovation in its' tracks Mason Miller (Monday, 8 October)

policy ht (Monday, 8 October)

Do not cater to the large corporations Carolyn Hillman (Monday, 8 October)

Sorry to see this happening Roman (Monday, 8 October)

"Non-discriminatory" commercial licenses impossible Adrian Tymes (Monday, 8 October)

Patented standards are not standards. chris.gamble@CPBINC.com (Monday, 8 October)

RAND is a bad Idea Karl Doblinger (Monday, 8 October)

Please Rethink Your Policy Hythian (Monday, 8 October)

Free Software compatibility Dmitry Borodaenko (Monday, 8 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Douglas Holt (Monday, 8 October)

The RAND proposed in the Patent Policy Framework Yves Savourel (Monday, 8 October)

RAND Patent Policy - Against davis (Monday, 8 October)

No thanks Morten rsted, [MOCH] (Monday, 8 October)

W3C Patent Policy Framework Christopher.J.Albertson@aero.org (Monday, 8 October)

WaSP to W3C: Remember Your Mission Steven Champeon (Monday, 8 October)

RAND Ryan Rajpaul (Monday, 8 October)

Comment BEN BARRAZA (Monday, 8 October)

If you love them, then run to them. nopatents@onmyweb.com (Monday, 8 October)

Patent Policy Dhruva Reddy (Monday, 8 October)

Comments to "In support of EFF's call for a royalty-free licensing model" Martin Olsson (Monday, 8 October)

Why RAND will kill the W3C Mark Mumford (Monday, 8 October)

wc3 Lorntz (Monday, 8 October)

Patent Policy Comment Andrew Meredith (Monday, 8 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> CoyoteinCA@netscape.net (Monday, 8 October)

Draft proposal allowing Patents in W3C standards Josh Fryman (Monday, 8 October)

Six issues arle lommel (Monday, 8 October)

Don't do it. Bill Evans (Monday, 8 October)

PATENTS John Seago (Monday, 8 October)

Keep the Web (Royalty) Free Mark Anderson*INTERACTIVE* (Monday, 8 October)

Objection to RAND Stuart Gaunt (Monday, 8 October)

The Patent Policy Framework Diego Lunetta (Monday, 8 October)

in support of patent-free standards Tom Garcia (Monday, 8 October)

w3c RAND licence laurent (Monday, 8 October)

The W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft is totally unacceptable Toby Perkins (Monday, 8 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Thomas Longuemart (Monday, 8 October)

Don't do it! Ostergaard, AJ (Monday, 8 October)

In support of EFF's call for a royalty-free licensing model Peter Magnusson (Monday, 8 October)

well.. Gilbert Fernandes (Monday, 8 October)

Stop Michael Wood (Monday, 8 October)

Patent Policy Working Group Ricardo Campos (Monday, 8 October)

Patent Policy Framework draft John Billings (Monday, 8 October)

common sense valko yotov (Monday, 8 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Michael Clarke (Monday, 8 October)

RAND will either kill W3C or the internet David Jander (Monday, 8 October)

RAND Policy Will Destroy The Internet Aaron Swenson (Monday, 8 October)

Re: We must fork the SVG standard (was: SVGA 1.0 uses RAND ->DO NOT ! implement it, DO NOT ! use it) chuck weinberger (Monday, 8 October)

bad idea bwg (Monday, 8 October)

Patent Policy on web standards - my concerns simeon.morgan@ideas.com.au (Monday, 8 October)

Patent policy is madness Ignacio Torres Masdeu (Monday, 8 October)

Vote no on rolaties bink (Monday, 8 October)

comments Alice Corbin (Monday, 8 October)

patents: whaddyew, crazy? Ray Gulick (Monday, 8 October)

Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory ? La Place (Monday, 8 October)

RAND J (Monday, 8 October)

Free money Making Website ! Costs Of Address raserat2001@yahoo.com (Sunday, 7 October)

Patent Policy Framework draft The Rev. Tony Begonja (Sunday, 7 October)

Comment on the W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Stuart Ambler (Sunday, 7 October)

No RAND licensing Alan Chiu (Monday, 8 October)

RAND & W3C Standards Paul Dundas (Monday, 8 October)

Stupid Ukiah Smith (Monday, 8 October)

Patent Policy Matthew Arieta (Monday, 8 October)

Patent Policy Eric Johnson (Sunday, 7 October)

another NO vote for RAND licensing paulc@best.com (Sunday, 7 October)

Cease & Desist C. B. Yarling (Sunday, 7 October)

Scenarios related to PPG Proposal derek lane (Sunday, 7 October)

"NO" TO RAND LICENSING Mike Leary (Sunday, 7 October)

Re: New list - www-patentpolicy-comment - maintained by djweitzner@w3.org Linda Morris (Sunday, 7 October)

patent policy michael d. henry (Sunday, 7 October)

WWW Patent Policy Narada Hess (Sunday, 7 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Meg Otto (Sunday, 7 October)

RAND Tor Perkins (Sunday, 7 October)

Say NO to RAND licensing David Mosher (Sunday, 7 October)

Comments Al Johnson (Sunday, 7 October)

Patent Policy Framework Thomas H. Mitchell, C.P.A. (Sunday, 7 October)

public comment Charles Geyer (Sunday, 7 October)

RAND patent licensing Phil Quinn (Sunday, 7 October)

RAND patent licensing Fred Condo (Sunday, 7 October)

Effect of public outrage?[was Re: SVG] William Loughborough (Sunday, 7 October)

Patent licensing decision Kevin (Sunday, 7 October)

W3C patent policy Richard (Sunday, 7 October)

Why Kenneth R Westerback (Sunday, 7 October)

RAND Dan Howard (Sunday, 7 October)

Patents don't belong on the WWW David Smith (Sunday, 7 October)

plea against RAND patents in W3C standards Bjoern Kriews (Sunday, 7 October)

RAND / Patent: NO ! Juergen Sauer (Sunday, 7 October)

RAND licensing and Free Software Alexandre Dulaunoy (Sunday, 7 October)

Re: We must fork the SVG standard (was: SVGA 1.0 uses RAND -> DO NOT ! implement it, DO NOT ! use it) Claude Zervas (Sunday, 7 October)

sack members John Priestley (Saturday, 6 October)

Free money Making Website ! Get One Before They R Gone I Got Mine raserat2001@yahoo.com (Sunday, 7 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> RM (Sunday, 7 October)

Patent Policy Clifford Satlow (Sunday, 7 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Janette Seidel (Sunday, 7 October)

Three substantial comments dr_lenz@ziplip.co.jp (Sunday, 7 October)

dangerous proposal Peter Lin (Tuesday, 2 October)

W3C Patent Policy Russ Howard (Tuesday, 2 October)

Re: RF > RAMMED ... sorry, I screwed up a link... Chris Worley (Tuesday, 2 October)

No Subject dr_lenz@ziplip.co.jp (Sunday, 7 October)

Patents restrict progress Michael Rowehl (Sunday, 7 October)

Three substantial comments dr_lenz@ziplip.co.jp (Sunday, 7 October)

Patent Policy - Setting the bar on "where it is not possible" Steven Weinstein (Sunday, 7 October)

RAND is not bad, but we're concerned about the W3C TopXML - Mark Wilson (Sunday, 7 October)

Don't allow standards based on RAND Licenses B.J. Herbison (Sunday, 7 October)

H.E.L.L.N.O. to R.A.N.D! Mike Amundsen (Saturday, 6 October)

Revised patent policy proposal Ippolito, Mark E. (Saturday, 6 October)

Against the RAND initiative Stephen Wynne (Saturday, 6 October)

No to RAND Sumanth Sukumar (Saturday, 6 October)

Against the Patent Policy Pedro Gil (Saturday, 6 October)

Well, its been fun... Claude Zervas (Saturday, 6 October)

RAND Eric Jacobsen (Saturday, 6 October)

License fees Ekkard Schnedermann (Saturday, 6 October)

Patents Svend Ezaki Tofte (Saturday, 6 October)

what are you doing?! josh penrod (Saturday, 6 October)

Enough about RAND Ray van der Woning (Saturday, 6 October)

Royalty Free YES, rand NO Tyler R Holcomb (Saturday, 6 October)

Rand Policy A.J. Madu (Saturday, 6 October)

W3C Patent Policy Peter Goode (Saturday, 6 October)

I vote for free standards Jussi Hirvi (Saturday, 6 October)

Response to Public Comments on the W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft José Luis Otermin (Saturday, 6 October)

w3c: patent (entrance barrier) R. Ivan Linderman \(best\) (Saturday, 6 October)

Breaking off Afonso Fernandez Nogueira (Saturday, 6 October)

patent concern Willis, Kevin J (Saturday, 6 October)

DON'T Orsted [Achtung] (Saturday, 6 October)

Allowing Patents on W3C standards will make the w3c redundant Christian Schaller (Saturday, 6 October)

You need to rethink your preposal about patented tech. Martin Veise (Saturday, 6 October)

Please don't shackle the web Khuzaima A. Lakdawala (Saturday, 6 October)

Patents Gregory Carter (Thursday, 4 October)

Concerned about the Patent Policy Peter Hanappe (Saturday, 6 October)

RAND (no kidding :) Lance Levsen (Saturday, 6 October)

Comment on The Patenting Info Keith Vick (Saturday, 6 October)

Why the sudden change of mind from W3C? David List (Saturday, 6 October)

RAND licensing = Bad Idea whj whj (Saturday, 6 October)

www-patentpolicy-comment Joris Van den Bergh (Saturday, 6 October)

Patent Policy Framework Draft Mark Koscak (Saturday, 6 October)

another vote against implementing RAND licensing procedures CPausheek@aol.com (Saturday, 6 October)

abuse of patents should not extend into standards realm John McMahon (Saturday, 6 October)

Conern of the term "reasonable and non-discriminatory royalty fees" Paul H. Smith (Saturday, 6 October)

comments about Patent Policy Framework draft Jason Brown (Saturday, 6 October)

Patent policy comments Terry Griffin (Saturday, 6 October)

I believe the W3C should not endorse Patented Technologies Shlomi Fish (Saturday, 6 October)

Crazy nam nguyen quoc (Saturday, 6 October)

Advice from a Modem War Survivor chuck weinberger (Saturday, 6 October)

Wrong thing going RAND Ky Vinh (Saturday, 6 October)

proposed W3C patent policy Dave_Touretzky@cs.cmu.edu (Saturday, 6 October)

Concerning Patents rdibble@dibble.net (Saturday, 6 October)

LiveJournal Opposes RAND Mark Kraft (Saturday, 6 October)

w3.org renamed to w3.com and retired tokiko (Saturday, 6 October)

OT: IETF [was: [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>] Jason Antony (Saturday, 6 October)

AGAINST RAND policy 3L@xwinds.com (Saturday, 6 October)

W3C Policy Breakdown Sean B. Palmer (Saturday, 6 October)

Rand licensing Barbara Pratt (Saturday, 6 October)

Patent Policy Working Group Curtis Hawthorne (Saturday, 6 October)

RAND licencing would lead to incompatibility problems Arto Teräs (Saturday, 6 October)

W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Greg Doran (Saturday, 6 October)

Turning the W3 into an impenetrable oligarchy kjensen (Friday, 5 October)

Against RAND from Singapore Seamus Phan (Friday, 5 October)

Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (Friday, 5 October)

Introduction of patents? God forbid! vivek achary (Friday, 5 October)

RAND licensing Miaoling Chiu (Friday, 5 October)

Regarding the use of patented technologies in standards Paul Lee (Wednesday, 3 October)

patents and the 3w Richard Lyons (Friday, 5 October)

Allowing patented software into standards Brian Clancey (Wednesday, 3 October)

Strongly disapprove David Collier-Brown (Thursday, 4 October)

Changename: W3C to P3C Joe Doran (Friday, 5 October)

NO Jerry Wood (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Changes would cause problems - but not insurmountable ones. Peter Street (Friday, 5 October)

No to patents Wanderley Ceschim (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Policy Framework draft Mike Dewey (Friday, 5 October)

No RAND Jim Edwards (Friday, 5 October)

Patents Alan Woodland (Friday, 5 October)

Formal Comment on W3C Patent Policy Framework, Working Draft 16 Stephen Satchell (Friday, 5 October)

RAND policy et. al. Douglas Stillinger (Friday, 5 October)

royalty-free web standards Jim Phillips (Friday, 5 October)

open standards nicholas paredes (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Policy Framework draft jduell@alumni.princeton.edu (Friday, 5 October)

Patent policy Sascha Brawer (Friday, 5 October)

Objection to the RAND licensing option in the proposed policy. Fred Sturman (Friday, 5 October)

RAND "standards" Mark W. Alexander (Friday, 5 October)

The proposed change Gerald Albitre (Friday, 5 October)

response to RAND Patent proposal Mann, Lydia (Friday, 5 October)

Fees for web standard products Ron Bogas (Friday, 5 October)

Following the Money Trail / Going Backwards on Democracy Frank Grave de Peralta (Friday, 5 October)

RF vs. RAND Mark Christensen (Friday, 5 October)

RAND licensing option is not sensible Louis C. Gasper, Ph.D., KHS (Friday, 5 October)

W3C patent policy Christoph Weber (Friday, 5 October)

patent policy comments Ilya Haykinson (Friday, 5 October)

The open-source community demands the immediate withdrawal of the proposal for a new W3C Patent Policy !!!! TISCALI (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Policy Framework draft Jon Osborn (Friday, 5 October)

patents in W3C standards chtodd@core.com (Friday, 5 October)

PersonalDB.net 회원으로 초대받으셨습니다. 관리자 (Friday, 5 October)

comments on patent policy Terrell Mitchell (Friday, 5 October)

Feedback on the Patent Policy Framework draft Ulrich Berens (Friday, 5 October)

Patents will undermine useability Charlie Brooks (Friday, 5 October)

discriminatory patents Michiel Ettema (Friday, 5 October)

What is reasonable? Eric Richardson (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Policies Karl Lehenbauer (Friday, 5 October)

W3C Patent Policy Framework Ricardo Signes (Friday, 5 October)

royalties for web standards? no ! Brian Carroll (Friday, 5 October)

After all your hard work? Alison Lister (Friday, 5 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Millsap, Michael G. (Friday, 5 October)

We have to ACT acborges@netcabo.pt (Friday, 5 October)

Part II: A Concrete Alternative Steve Waldman (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Policy Framework draft Gordon Osse (Friday, 5 October)

Will The W3C Destroy The Web? Bill Major (Friday, 5 October)

Part I: General Comments Steve Waldman (Friday, 5 October)

Licensing fees for implementation of standards Max Rible (Friday, 5 October)

Opinion in opposition to RAND provisions of Patent Policy Luigi P. Bai (Friday, 5 October)

Thanks but no thanks. Brian Carpenter (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Policy Feedback William E. \ (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Policy MIKE TAYLOR (Friday, 5 October)

Support for Open-Source Stephen C. Scherer (Friday, 5 October)

A logical appeal to retain RF standards for Web sysadmin@pinjax.com (Friday, 5 October)

patents Court Demas (Friday, 5 October)

Proposed RAND Patent Policy Jeb Potterfield (Friday, 5 October)

Don't add RAND licensing to the W3C process Brent J. Nordquist (Friday, 5 October)

proposed standards jacques@panix.com (Friday, 5 October)

RAND Licensing David Walker (Friday, 5 October)

w3c proposal on patents Eric Montgomery (Friday, 5 October)

RAND will fragment the web Case, Scott (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Policy Framework Louis Calitz (Friday, 5 October)

somethin smell fishy Ken Forbes (Friday, 5 October)

RAND Is A Bad Idea Duane Robertson (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Policy Framework Tommy Marcus McGuire (Friday, 5 October)

Proposal for modification to Member Patent Licensing Commitments. David Woodhouse (Friday, 5 October)

web-patent policy comments Tyler Morrison (Friday, 5 October)

"NO" on RAND patent policy Kenn Louis (Friday, 5 October)

Do not let w3c become a tool for big corporations Victor Bogado da Silva Lins (Friday, 5 October)

Why a RAND? W3 & Microsoft/IE -- J. Payne (Friday, 5 October)

Royalties are discriminatory. David Andrew Michael Noelle (Friday, 5 October)

RAND Shawn Wall (Friday, 5 October)

my opinion on the subject (Web Technology Patent Area) Pieter Reint Siegers Kort (Friday, 5 October)

No to patents in W3C standards. Russell McOrmond (Friday, 5 October)

Proposed Patent Policy John Panzer (Friday, 5 October)

please rethink your policies regarding patents and RAND, simon (Friday, 5 October)

Objection to RAND Licensing Lori Dupuy (Friday, 5 October)

NO NO NO! Daisy Williams (Wednesday, 3 October)

Objection to RAND Licensing Paul Dupuy, Jr. (Friday, 5 October)

my comments on the Patent Policy for WWW Standards Dieter Van Uytvanck (Friday, 5 October)

RAND Licensing Option Lee R Boynton (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Policy for WWW Standards John Gisclon (Friday, 5 October)

RAND Policy for web standards Richard Coleman (Friday, 5 October)

RAND implies more changes Lucio Tato (Friday, 5 October)

What to do about the W3C? Dave Winer (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Policy Ted Bergeron (Friday, 5 October)

Science != Bussiness Gustavo Carvalho Homem (Friday, 5 October)

The argument against patented protocols is not ideological, it is pragmatic Russell Sears (Friday, 5 October)

Support only patent-free technology Allan Oepping (Friday, 5 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Ing. Alejandro Vzquez C. (Friday, 5 October)

Comments on Patent Policy dat23 (Friday, 5 October)

Don't change now. Effie Kolbeins (Friday, 5 October)

Comments on Patent Policy Framework draft Alex Bischoff (Friday, 5 October)

STRONG OBJECTION TO the inclusion of RAND Dr. Mahesh S. Raisinghani (Friday, 5 October)

W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users Sudhir Gandotra (Friday, 5 October)

Don't mix standards with patents Nigel Stewart (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Policy Framework draft Gordon Fischer (Friday, 5 October)

RAND will be disastrous for the web Steven Jarvis (Friday, 5 October)

Standard + RAND = Monopoly Ron Schofield (Friday, 5 October)

Comments on patent policy Leonard Heyman (Friday, 5 October)

SVG ad inf. F J Franklin (Friday, 5 October)

comment on your patent policy framework draft ozan s. yigit (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Policy Edward Terry (Friday, 5 October)

Do you listen to the people? Jenny Ashman (Friday, 5 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> dean blackketter (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Policy Susan Margulies (Friday, 5 October)

Vote agains the "RAND" policy. Daniel G. Linder (Friday, 5 October)

no to RAND licensing XvDebbyvX@aol.com (Friday, 5 October)

RAND Alex Morales (Friday, 5 October)

Re: IBM's comment on w3c patent policy ZilF@aol.com (Friday, 5 October)

RAND vs RF patents James Hebdon (Friday, 5 October)

Patents or Standards - Choose One. J. Mark Turner (Friday, 5 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Atabey Kaygun (Friday, 5 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Benjamin Edwards (Friday, 5 October)

Selling out to special interests on Patent Policy Benjamin Watkins (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Policies... Brian Powell (Saturday, 6 October)

RAND = BAD idea Darren Blaser (Friday, 5 October)

RAND is incompatible with free/opensource implementations Filipe Santos (Friday, 5 October)

No to patents Charles McPhate (Friday, 5 October)

say no to RAND licensing Chad K. Bisk (Friday, 5 October)

You're digging your own grave with this... Jeppe Cramon (Friday, 5 October)

W3C Patent Policy/RAND Licensing Agreement BlakGard@aol.com (Friday, 5 October)

RAND RFPC 1 1 (Friday, 5 October)

open standards are the best way to encourage innovation and interoperability Tim Edwards (Friday, 5 October)

Additional sources of commentary that I believe the W3C should know about Jesper Juhl (Friday, 5 October)

Just say no larfx@ticnet.com (Friday, 5 October)

RAND Phil Reardon (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Policy Ronny Krashinsky (Friday, 5 October)

Comments on W3C patent policy Paul Schreiber (Friday, 5 October)

W3C Patent Policy Joe Glenn (Friday, 5 October)

May you please consider revising your draft? gjldp@iquebec.com (Friday, 5 October)

RAND Definition Curtis Weyant (Friday, 5 October)

RAND Policy al.gaspar@lrn.va.gov (Friday, 5 October)

W3C Patent Policy Michaela Merz (Friday, 5 October)

World Wide Web Consortium Patent Policy Working Group Phillip Smith (Friday, 5 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Peter Haight (Friday, 5 October)

Just Say No to RAND Licensing Bob Glover (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Policy Working Group Rick Brady (Friday, 5 October)

Don't allow standards to be encumbered by patents TOM HAVILAND (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Policy Framework draft Jim Jinkins (Friday, 5 October)

Re: We must fork the SVG standard (was: SVGA 1.0 uses RAND -> DO NOT ! implement it, DO NOT ! use it) Glenn Randers-Pehrson (Friday, 5 October)

Proposal for defining acceptability of RAND licensing model. David Woodhouse (Friday, 5 October)

Public comment on the Patent Policy Framework Larry Bezeau (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Policy Framework draft Matt Michaelsen (Friday, 5 October)

RAND scott schmidt (Friday, 5 October)

RAND Licence Arnaud Vaneste (Friday, 5 October)

Good Idea, make the already big companies BIGGER! Freedome On the NET (Friday, 5 October)

RAND licensing is a bad idea Patrick Hoogendijk (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Policy Comment Tuomas Pellonpera (Friday, 5 October)

against RAND Alexander Nakhimovsky (Friday, 5 October)

Royalty-free licenses, PLEASE Pugsley Donald E CRBE (Friday, 5 October)

w3c have been like a drug broker as japanese mafia? tat-s (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Policy Bill Bland (Friday, 5 October)

RAND Licensing Policy Alik Widge (Friday, 5 October)

Not a GIF-issue again...please Henrik Olsson (Friday, 5 October)

RAND licensing would have negative effect. Perttu Puska (Friday, 5 October)

On the use of Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory fees Itamar Shtull-Trauring (Friday, 5 October)

Comments on the new patent-policy Egil Moeller (Friday, 5 October)

RAND license: no grazie Andrea Montefusco (Friday, 5 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Giuliano Carlini (Friday, 5 October)

Patent policy draft: DNAR? Cedric Degea (Friday, 5 October)

World Wide Web Consortium Patent Policy (RAND) G.M. von Hippel (Friday, 5 October)

Comment to RAND Andreas Huennebeck (Friday, 5 October)

comments RAND licensing Manegold (Friday, 5 October)

concerns from Poland Adam Kightley (Friday, 5 October)

Some of my reasons for objecting to the Patent Policy and RAND Jesper Juhl (Friday, 5 October)

RAND Steven Wallace (Friday, 5 October)

RE: [WD]: Patents on Web Standards - dropping the petition S.Marshall@open.ac.uk (Friday, 5 October)

RAND Policy sattanino (Friday, 5 October)

The issues Paolo Campanella (Friday, 5 October)

Patents not in the best interest of the web community Kurt L. Sussman (Friday, 5 October)

Patents will kill the standards Bruno VERNAY (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Policy disapproval Bob Evans (Friday, 5 October)

Would it be the end of W3C standards as standards ? xavier (Friday, 5 October)

[FWD: Please keep "RAND" out of W3 standards] DspitzDan@netscape.net (Friday, 5 October)

No RAND licensing FreemanAZ@aol.com (Friday, 5 October)

Gartner's viewpoint Jason Antony (Friday, 5 October)

Please re-think patent policy. Elliott Kirschling (Friday, 5 October)

Proposed RAND Policy Glenn Jacobson (Friday, 5 October)

RAND patents Greg Reagle (Friday, 5 October)

just say no Daniel Pirone (Friday, 5 October)

Patents and Standards: two competing philosophies kevingmoore (Friday, 5 October)

Absurd Patent Policy Howard Christeller (Friday, 5 October)

NO to RAND Matthias Urlichs (Friday, 5 October)

Standards Kamil Jonca (Friday, 5 October)

PPF draft Rick Potthoff (Friday, 5 October)

non-free patents have no place in w3c standards David Kimdon (Friday, 5 October)

Re: Comment on WC-3 Patent Policy Dick Byrd (Friday, 5 October)

RAND is a Thought Policeman's Charter Derek Lewis (Friday, 5 October)

RAND comments. Greg Wilkins (Friday, 5 October)

RAND: Misguided, Wrong Shamim Mohamed (Friday, 5 October)

Patents violate founding principle of w3.org Bill Gallagher (Friday, 5 October)

This says is all Tom Hood (Friday, 5 October)

why the W3C should reject RAND Andrew Hagen (Friday, 5 October)

Voice against the use of pateneted standards on the web vik@econz.co.nz (Friday, 5 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> JTM (Friday, 5 October)

Patent Policy Framework Draft td (Friday, 5 October)

patent policy reponse Zach Welch (Friday, 5 October)

Attack on democracy? Martin Leisener (Friday, 5 October)

Patents have no place in standards Gavin Treadgold (Friday, 5 October)

What ? are you crazy David Boosalis (Friday, 5 October)

Why are you choosing the wrong way? Juan R. Pozo (Friday, 5 October)

fees SkinWalker (Thursday, 4 October)

charging money for e-mail, etc. William Wallace (Friday, 5 October)

Cybersource vehemently opposes the W3C Patent Policy Framework proposal Con Zymaris (Friday, 5 October)

Reject RAND Shiraz Kanga (Thursday, 4 October)

W3C Patent policy- ? why Michael Guercio (Thursday, 4 October)

Patent compromise? Tim Mensch (Thursday, 4 October)

Royalty on Patents Jeremy Conn (Thursday, 4 October)

patent inclusion in W3C standards Doug Hunt (Thursday, 4 October)

Fork to gnuStandards if the W3C hurts the web mark_tracey@yahoo.com (Thursday, 4 October)

No software patents through the back door Alexander List (Thursday, 4 October)

www-patentpolicy-comment Matt Kasdorf (Thursday, 4 October)

Please Reject the Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Chris Geanious (Thursday, 4 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> gte592n@prism.gatech.edu (Thursday, 4 October)

Your Technology Sucks! CharlesAdams14@aol.com (Thursday, 4 October)

:( CharlesAdams14@aol.com (Thursday, 4 October)

The W3C Patent Policy undermine the W3C credibility and neutrality. TISCALI (Thursday, 4 October)

Comment on patent policy Lowell Harris (Thursday, 4 October)

Opposition to the incorporation of licensed technology- an example from the Airlines Justin Seiferth (Thursday, 4 October)

Idiot notion to include patented technology in web standards FDWeller on Qwest (Thursday, 4 October)

Think about our great great grand children. Charles Esson (Thursday, 4 October)

Opposed to Patents in Web Standards SuperLinux (Thursday, 4 October)

RAND Terry Bailey (Thursday, 4 October)

RAND Curt Wuollet (Thursday, 4 October)

comment on RAND Russell Uman (Thursday, 4 October)

Free Internet, Free Standards misterl@primusnetz.de (Thursday, 4 October)

FEES Bert Veldhuizen (Thursday, 4 October)

RAND is a bad idea Ray Benjamin (Thursday, 4 October)

No Patents J. Ramsey (Thursday, 4 October)

Open the W3C to developers or the developers will found a new W3C !!! TISCALI (Thursday, 4 October)

Application Developer Arlen A. Greer (Thursday, 4 October)

W3C Patent Policy Johannes la Poutre (Thursday, 4 October)

"Standards" driven by profit? Sounds proprietary to me! Jesse W. Asher (Thursday, 4 October)

YOU are completely selfish & greedy Howard Smith (Thursday, 4 October)

Do I understand this issue? Dietrich, Joseph (Thursday, 4 October)

Patent Policy Emery, Pat (Thursday, 4 October)

patent policy cheeser@ionet.net (Thursday, 4 October)

I oppose patented standards James (Thursday, 4 October)

Clarity is key Joe Chellman (Thursday, 4 October)

FTC denied Dell patent rights to VESA VL bus in 1996 Jim Davies (Thursday, 4 October)

RAND bordcon@earthlink.net (Thursday, 4 October)

This developer strongly opposes "RAND" proposal Cole Thompson (Thursday, 4 October)

keep it open please PISINI, JOHN E (Thursday, 4 October)

Go for it Carlos Méndez (Thursday, 4 October)

RAND fees Robert C. Brock (Thursday, 4 October)

W3C Patent Policy Jan Peter Hecking (Thursday, 4 October)

Avoid schism -- for the sake of the W3C Michael Welles (Thursday, 4 October)

Had to happen sooner or later craig (Thursday, 4 October)

Don't be insane! Chris Pollard, CRC (Thursday, 4 October)

I recognize only royalty-free standards Scott Johnston (Thursday, 4 October)

Public Comments Aaron Carr (Thursday, 4 October)

W3C policy Mirko Kloppstech (Thursday, 4 October)

Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users Federico Heinz (Thursday, 4 October)

Fees on standars, Patents on standars -> BAD IDEA Antonio Arauzo Azofra (Thursday, 4 October)

If WSDL doesn't qualify as low-level infrastructure, this is hopeless Mark Wutka (Thursday, 4 October)

Long live open information! Imre Simon (Thursday, 4 October)

Comments on Patent Policy Framework draft Jonathan Day (Thursday, 4 October)

RESPONSE -- OPPOSE PATENTS Mark Interrante (Thursday, 4 October)

W3C patents proposal Simon Kitching (Thursday, 4 October)

PPF contradicts W3C's own mission. Thomas Jedenfelt (Thursday, 4 October)

standard vs. patent Anoop Sarkar (Thursday, 4 October)

RAND is bad. You folks are Liars. Yes, I read it. Comments below. Cameron Miller (Thursday, 4 October)

Disgraceful Marcelo Finger (Thursday, 4 October)

Opposed to proposed patent policy shopbot (Thursday, 4 October)

W3C harry burton (Thursday, 4 October)

Proposal for clarification of RAND licence definition. David Woodhouse (Thursday, 4 October)

Importance of Interoperability and the effects of non RF licenses danielv@netvision.net.il (Thursday, 4 October)

Please: Keep the Internet Royalty Free! Tobias Benedikt Hoevekamp (Thursday, 4 October)

Patents and the WWW Chris Brand (Thursday, 4 October)

no RAND Alan Bol (Thursday, 4 October)

Re: Incorporating proprietary formats in any recommendation is a BAD idea! Glenn Randers-Pehrson (Thursday, 4 October)

keep standards free and open Chip & Debby Piller (Thursday, 4 October)

Zolera patent policy comment Frederick Hirsch (Thursday, 4 October)

I stand in opposition to RAND cglasser@dotcast.com (Thursday, 4 October)

RAND is inviting further abuse John Telford (Thursday, 4 October)

Latest patent drafts Bas Burger (Thursday, 4 October)

Public Comments on the W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Kai Henningsen (Thursday, 4 October)

Feedback on the RAND policy Eric Johnson (Thursday, 4 October)

Eliminate RAND option from new patent policy, only allow RF David G. Durand (Thursday, 4 October)

Stop this... It's a shame Juvenal A. Silva Jr. (Thursday, 4 October)

Against standards incorporating 'patented' technology Enrique A. Chaparro (Thursday, 4 October)

Against Patent Policy Framework and RAND Ken Seikel (Thursday, 4 October)

W3C standards William Kramer (Thursday, 4 October)

Incorporating proprietary formats in any recommendation is a BAD idea! Bruce Heerssen (Thursday, 4 October)

RAND fees ComlLoans@aol.com (Thursday, 4 October)

Patent Policy Framework Michael Gbadebo (Thursday, 4 October)

No Jeffrey Foran (Thursday, 4 October)

RAND is Orwellian doublespeak Peter Lawson (Thursday, 4 October)

W3C Patent Policy Framework alan.hanna@us.datex-ohmeda.com (Thursday, 4 October)

open standards. D. Jeff Dionne (Thursday, 4 October)

In strong opposition to RAND J. Maynard Gelinas (Thursday, 4 October)

Your RAND dreams Dean William Schaf (Thursday, 4 October)

Kees heeft mijn naaktfotos op fotovanmijnex.nl gezet! Claudia Evers (Thursday, 4 October)

Web Standards should avoid patents Yaron M. Minsky (Thursday, 4 October)

Kees heeft mijn naaktfotos op fotovanmijnex.nl gezet! Claudia Evers (Thursday, 4 October)

SVG: "nothing at all" is better than RAND F J Franklin (Thursday, 4 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> James Ferguson (Thursday, 4 October)

Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users WINTER,CHRIS (HP-Sweden,ex1) (Thursday, 4 October)

patent policy comment Brock Organ (Thursday, 4 October)

what ?? JIMBOB (Thursday, 4 October)

Comments on W3C Patent Policy Framework draft Michael Thome (Thursday, 4 October)

w3c patent policy framework James Lamm (Thursday, 4 October)

"Lower-layer infrastructure" needs clarification, timing stinks Jeffrey Zeldman (Thursday, 4 October)

RAND policy objection Eric Johnson (Thursday, 4 October)

Standards and patents Alan Mitchell Durham (Thursday, 4 October)

RAND licensing mode bad idea Paul Caton (Thursday, 4 October)

NO -- NEVER Parkison, Ron (Thursday, 4 October)

patents unacceptable in open standards George M. Sipe (Thursday, 4 October)

No. Matthew G. Saroff (Thursday, 4 October)

w3c shadowdaemon@earthlink.net (Thursday, 4 October)

SVG F J Franklin (Thursday, 4 October)

RAND Bob Hogan (Thursday, 4 October)

W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Sean McPherson (Thursday, 4 October)

YOUR FREE 0870 NUMBER! HERE IT IS! (Thursday, 4 October)

This is bad, and can't possibly work. Justin Bell (Thursday, 4 October)

there is no need for this Robert Ellis (Thursday, 4 October)

public opinion on W3C Pierre Phaneuf (Thursday, 4 October)

Licensing mathematics - Apple patent Jozef Halbersztadt (Thursday, 4 October)

Think about it david mills (Thursday, 4 October)

Rand Policy Richard Gregoire (Thursday, 4 October)

Is Apple's patent valid? Jason Antony (Thursday, 4 October)

OK... Jean-Philippe Moins (Thursday, 4 October)

Shocked Chris Howells (Thursday, 4 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Thomas Clavier (Thursday, 4 October)

Why standards then? Raphael Bauduin (Thursday, 4 October)

Further objections, and question for Janet Daly Jeremy Sanders (Thursday, 4 October)

The thin end of the wedge? Alan Hartley-Smith (Thursday, 4 October)

Web standards should be free! jonas persson. [artopod] (Thursday, 4 October)

Comments Andy Macdonald (Thursday, 4 October)

Just agreeing with a lot of people on Slashdot, and other places Martyn Ranyard (Thursday, 4 October)

Legal infrastructure in a W3C recommendation ? Alexandre Vitrac (Thursday, 4 October)

Royalty free ?!? Beretta Paolo (Thursday, 4 October)

W3C Patent Policy chgo9127@rcnchicago.com (Thursday, 4 October)

problem #1: the authors Mathias.Picker@virtual-earth.de (Thursday, 4 October)

Opposing sections 4 and 5 Mathias.Picker@virtual-earth.de (Thursday, 4 October)

No e-patents at W3C ! Mathias BAVAY (Thursday, 4 October)

Comment Matteo Brancaleoni (Thursday, 4 October)

Patents Policy darrylb@iprimus.com.au (Thursday, 4 October)

RAND equals No Standard Roberto Gliese (Thursday, 4 October)

Why "non-discriminatory" _is_ discriminatory Pavel Roskin (Thursday, 4 October)

Non-discriminatory - I don't thnk so Nik Jewell (Thursday, 4 October)

Patents on W3C Standards john.wilson@countryenergy.com.au (Thursday, 4 October)

Comment Tobias von Mangoldt (Thursday, 4 October)

comments tim (Thursday, 4 October)

Can't agree Kitada Naruhide (Thursday, 4 October)

I don't like it Wojtek (Thursday, 4 October)

VENTURE CAPITAL Malik Madaki (Thursday, 4 October)

comment Laurent Klinger (Thursday, 4 October)

Comments on Janet Daly's statement Richard Stallman (Thursday, 4 October)

No Bourzeix, Stephane (Thursday, 4 October)

Why RAND is a bad idea Walter Dnes (Thursday, 4 October)

Check Out the Best Prices for Your Toner Cartridges 89vkimiilgoseca@britanicainternet.net (Wednesday, 3 October)

Patent Policy Framework draft cmorgan@aracnet.com (Thursday, 4 October)

don't hide it Mark Hahn (Thursday, 4 October)

Licensing mathematics Frank Horowitz (Thursday, 4 October)

Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Paul M. Lundgren (Thursday, 4 October)

Tim Berners-Lee, what is your stance on RAND? Jason Antony (Thursday, 4 October)

Comment on Rand patent policy John Snippe (Thursday, 4 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> terry (Thursday, 4 October)

Including patented material in open standards is a bad idea... Jim Powers (Thursday, 4 October)

reasonable and nondiscriminatory (RAND) fees for Web-standard products Derk (Thursday, 4 October)

Response to the RAND licencing proposal Samuel Taylor (Thursday, 4 October)

About PPF Masaaki KOGA (Thursday, 4 October)

W3C Greg Parker (Thursday, 4 October)

more work for W3C... Lnutt (Thursday, 4 October)

keep royalties out of the web Dan Stromberg (Thursday, 4 October)

Are You crazy? Lamar or Rose Combee (Thursday, 4 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Allen Small (Thursday, 4 October)

Just who the heck do you think you are rustyis (Thursday, 4 October)

I oppose the proposal Jeremy Keith (Thursday, 4 October)

Opposed to inclusion of patents in standards Brian Clancey (Thursday, 4 October)

license fees will never be non-discriminatory bal_cyberdude@gmx.net (Thursday, 4 October)

The W3C kills oneself . VICECONTI.COM (Thursday, 4 October)

Such a sad state of affairs Sargent, Todd (Wednesday, 3 October)

problem? Jakub K. Boguslaw (Thursday, 4 October)

Patents in standards and national sovereignty Rufus Polson (Wednesday, 3 October)

Well-intentioned but misguided ? Darren Munt (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND StonehengeTroll@aol.com (Wednesday, 3 October)

"PATENT INSIDE" - doesnt work at all disorder@ecosse.net (Wednesday, 3 October)

W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Cliffyaw@aol.com (Wednesday, 3 October)

Patented standard Terje (Wednesday, 3 October)

charging for use of the web David Marchand (Wednesday, 3 October)

NO RAND soji fatoki (Wednesday, 3 October)

Who do you think you are?????????? lreisch@DOH.STATE.NM.US (Wednesday, 3 October)

WHAT????????????!!!!!!!!!! Jason Reid (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND fees HEW (Wednesday, 3 October)

fees for Web-standard products. Kelvin Scott (Wednesday, 3 October)

Slightly off-topic: the 'patented' technologies in SVG Simon Brooke (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND fees David Brenneman (Wednesday, 3 October)

charges................... Ruth Attell (Wednesday, 3 October)

Re: Apple's SVG patent Les Barstow (Wednesday, 3 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Frank Schwaller (Wednesday, 3 October)

Protect the future before it's too late!! Douglas Page (Thursday, 4 October)

The protection is needed, the patents are not Les Barstow (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND Will Kill Open Source Anna Au (Wednesday, 3 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Sandip Sarma (Wednesday, 3 October)

Opposition William Stookey (Wednesday, 3 October)

It shouldn't be done Guille -bisho- (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND Will Discredit the W3C Jon G. Booth (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND pulsj1018@aol.com (Wednesday, 3 October)

Objection zazen (Wednesday, 3 October)

Box cutters found in WWW Prasad Kommoju (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND arguments... Golden Tiger (Wednesday, 3 October)

W3 recommendations covered by patent(s) Tor Slettnes (Wednesday, 3 October)

patent policy vs open source and free software Matthieu Herrb (Wednesday, 3 October)

No to RAND Ahmad Sofyan (Wednesday, 3 October)

Your greed Mike & Anisa Golden (Wednesday, 3 October)

web patents Mark Groen (Wednesday, 3 October)

We must fork the SVG standard (was: SVGA 1.0 uses RAND -> DO NOT ! implement it, DO NOT ! use it) Joseph Reagle (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND is Unreasonable and Discriminatory! guinevere liberty (Wednesday, 3 October)

~~~DO NOT PASS THE RAND POLICY ~~~ Russell Pankratz (Wednesday, 3 October)

A bad idea WoodKR@ugcorp.com (Wednesday, 3 October)

Apple's SVG patent #US5379129 Daniel Phillips (Wednesday, 3 October)

Do you think about stuff? Hippieman (Wednesday, 3 October)

stop it RAND Carmine Monte (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND fees Joan Stanton (Wednesday, 3 October)

The internet should be available to the masses, not just the rich and educated Robert Thomas (Wednesday, 3 October)

No RAND Policy! Erik Parris (Wednesday, 3 October)

software patents Lou Cephyr (Wednesday, 3 October)

The web used to be a truly open medium... Martin Sammtleben (Wednesday, 3 October)

No Rand for Me the head lemur (Wednesday, 3 October)

I do not support this RAND proposal W.D.Wiseman (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND D J Richert (Wednesday, 3 October)

Fees Mark K. Muma (Wednesday, 3 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Ryan Connor (Wednesday, 3 October)

Comment Jim Henson (Wednesday, 3 October)

uh hmmm April Neibarger II (Wednesday, 3 October)

GIF royalties Thomas Ingledew (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND don@solderquik.com (Wednesday, 3 October)

if (RAND) { delete W3C; W3C = NULL; W3C = new CElection } Larry Dobson (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND Policy Brad Coburn (Wednesday, 3 October)

Good intentions is the road to hell paved with Valentine Iourine (Wednesday, 3 October)

Responding to RAND Simon Brooke (Wednesday, 3 October)

reasonable and nondiscriminatory (RAND) fees for Web-standard products bill wirt (Wednesday, 3 October)

No!! RAND! Cameron Fry (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND Jon Doe (Wednesday, 3 October)

Paying to develop the Web? Jeremy McPeak (Wednesday, 3 October)

What are you doing??? William C. \(Bill\) Thames (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND is the problem Dr E B Bettler (Wednesday, 3 October)

Learn from recent history. Martin C S Gauffin (Wednesday, 3 October)

Just don´t do it Jonas Myrenås (Wednesday, 3 October)

Rand Greg (Wednesday, 3 October)

This must be stopped Terje (Wednesday, 3 October)

Stop Scott Palmer (Wednesday, 3 October)

destruction of the web... Charles McCray (Wednesday, 3 October)

Fee's Don C Livingston (Wednesday, 3 October)

STUPID Robert Lee Peeler (Wednesday, 3 October)

How dare you! Mary Ayala (Wednesday, 3 October)

Your policy. Russell Thomas (Wednesday, 3 October)

Patented Standards? John Richter (Wednesday, 3 October)

Re:%20IETF%20Patent%20Policy Carl Beehler (Wednesday, 3 October)

Don't make the wrong move on patents Luke Melia (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND Micheal E. Barkley (Wednesday, 3 October)

Bad Idea Mark Cunningham (Wednesday, 3 October)

Patent Policy Framework Mike Shea Jr (Wednesday, 3 October)

Patents and Standards Cartier, Philip (Wednesday, 3 October)

IETF Patent Policy Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND keymaker (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND John-Houston Design & Implementation (Wednesday, 3 October)

Negative Feedback James Berryhill (Wednesday, 3 October)

W3C proposal could allow patent grabs on standards John Napolitano (Wednesday, 3 October)

Another sin of CAPITALISM Mike Guerrette (Wednesday, 3 October)

Will the W3C Destroy the Web? Steven Bell (Wednesday, 3 October)

The web wouldent be the same Andreas Knapp (Wednesday, 3 October)

Rand Policy Jesse S Housman (Wednesday, 3 October)

Talkback: Will the W3C Destroy the Web Friou Deming (Wednesday, 3 October)

What happened to free speech? Harger, Stacia (Wednesday, 3 October)

Stop the RAND Fees! ChnlSrfr@aol.com (Wednesday, 3 October)

stupid idea Gary Powell (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND Fees NPPrice@aol.com (Wednesday, 3 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> osmar (Wednesday, 3 October)

Fwd: Patent Policy Comment TRUassayist1@aol.com (Wednesday, 3 October)

The Once and Future Web Michael Rose (Wednesday, 3 October)

A question. JKelly (Wednesday, 3 October)

nondiscriminatory (RAND) fees for Web-standard products. Lee (Wednesday, 3 October)

What if we all follow your idea Pål Wester (Wednesday, 3 October)

do not tax the Web Bob Caron (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND policy. reasonable and nondiscriminatory James Stanton (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND FEES! Roy Harrington (Wednesday, 3 October)

Charing for web products NoSpam (Wednesday, 3 October)

Once in a lifetime chance, please read. President of Vallke Solutions - Velius D'Unnero (Wednesday, 3 October)

Objection - Impossible for Small Businesses Jenny Ono Suttaby (Wednesday, 3 October)

Opposition to proposed RAND policy gavin (Wednesday, 3 October)

My objection to the patent policy S.Marshall@open.ac.uk (Wednesday, 3 October)

Mine field of software patents Rob Carmichael (Wednesday, 3 October)

Do not do this emmet obrien (BI) (Wednesday, 3 October)

Fees......... MyCrowsSoft (Wednesday, 3 October)

W3C.....Follow The Money... Christopher M. Strehl (Wednesday, 3 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Pawel Kowalski (Wednesday, 3 October)

Patent Policy review David Leslie (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND isn't; Response misleading Russell Marks (Wednesday, 3 October)

BAD BAD IDEA!!!!! RAND FEES...NOOOOOOOOO ilikechet (Wednesday, 3 October)

Patent Comments Bryan - ECS Inc. (Wednesday, 3 October)

SVGA 1.0 uses RAND -> DO NOT ! implement it, DO NOT ! use it sup sup (Wednesday, 3 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Peter Adamson (Wednesday, 3 October)

W3C Patent Policy Framework bitleech@gmx.de (Wednesday, 3 October)

W3C Patent Policy Framework bitleech@gmx.de (Wednesday, 3 October)

Patentented Standards Are Harmful David C Thompson (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND fees kurttasker (Wednesday, 3 October)

(obvious) Michael Shigorin (Wednesday, 3 October)

Patents have no place in web standards Joe Chellman (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND luke carter (Wednesday, 3 October)

They are farming us! Erik Sigra (Wednesday, 3 October)

Money Grubbing Paul Pollard (Wednesday, 3 October)

NO to RAND Fees Rob Kerr (Wednesday, 3 October)

No patents on WWW Kenneth Geisshirt (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND Tom McDonald (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND will destroy the net. Sergey Tiraspolsky (Wednesday, 3 October)

Forbid RAND, require open source compatibility; W3C mission DEMANDS it David Wheeler (Wednesday, 3 October)

no RAND CHARGES. justin prince (Wednesday, 3 October)

Insanity Justin Moore (Wednesday, 3 October)

what Derek Moore (Wednesday, 3 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Dan Mordan (Wednesday, 3 October)

Stop it Stop it! Carol (Wednesday, 3 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> ED Summers (Wednesday, 3 October)

w3c bill francis (Wednesday, 3 October)

Followup to your response: RAND is BY DEFINITION discriminatory Seth Delackner (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND fees Amy Dawson (Wednesday, 3 October)

One last comment... Steve Smith (Wednesday, 3 October)

Rand policy! Louis Barlow (Wednesday, 3 October)

Shame on W3c Matt Mason (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND FEES ARE ROBBERY CRAIG FREEMAN (Wednesday, 3 October)

patent policy Mark Kot (Wednesday, 3 October)

W3C Patent Policy - A Comment Steve Smith (Wednesday, 3 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Greg Wastek (Wednesday, 3 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Brian K. Hill (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND Shawn Tempesta (Wednesday, 3 October)

the worst idea for web L. Watkins (Wednesday, 3 October)

Incompatible with GPL Ian Bicking (Wednesday, 3 October)

NO Daniel Blum (Wednesday, 3 October)

Charges? Rick Oldfield (Wednesday, 3 October)

Jerks Larry (Wednesday, 3 October)

you guys are crazy Christopher Doris (Wednesday, 3 October)

patent policy Jack Nagel (Wednesday, 3 October)

Patent Policy Randy Chase (Wednesday, 3 October)

My view of the new standard that some jerks are trying to force on the rest of us bryancox2 (Wednesday, 3 October)

Your policy STINKS Me at Hotmail (Wednesday, 3 October)

Patent Policy Review Period Extended Tim Sweeney (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND fees Rob Horton (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND policy of W3C Alan Shalloway (Wednesday, 3 October)

The Death of the W3C Foretold Nigel Blackwell (Wednesday, 3 October)

A plot to destroy W3C Jacek Piskozub (Wednesday, 3 October)

w3c John Mobley (Wednesday, 3 October)

W3C standards should remain unencumbered by patents. L. Adrian Griffis (Wednesday, 3 October)

HERE TODAY - GONE TOMORROW? Dawn M. Burian (Wednesday, 3 October)

Resist RAND Daniel Hartmeier (Wednesday, 3 October)

Patent Policy Framewrok Joshua (Wednesday, 3 October)

why software patents can not be non-discriminatory Todd L Miller (Wednesday, 3 October)

The end?? Jeff Wulfekuhl (Wednesday, 3 October)

Patent policy James Schneider (Wednesday, 3 October)

Against RAND, patents and lawyers Jacques Pelletier (Wednesday, 3 October)

Late but furious Terry Laurenzo (Wednesday, 3 October)

Objection David J. Ruck (Wednesday, 3 October)

comments Michael Kale (Wednesday, 3 October)

W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Justin Daw (Tuesday, 2 October)

Proposed Changes in W3C patent policy Cheryl Flinn (Tuesday, 2 October)

RAND fees Zach Anderson (Tuesday, 2 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> kyle willis (Tuesday, 2 October)

Proposed W3C Patent Policy Darnell McGavock (Tuesday, 2 October)

Ever read Orwell? samantha (Wednesday, 3 October)

patent policy comment Purtell, Andrew (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patent Policy Draft Jim Farmer (Tuesday, 2 October)

Objections to patent policy Pete Black (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patents? Barry Coward (Tuesday, 2 October)

RAND: What is reasonable? John McDermott (Tuesday, 2 October)

W3C Patent Policy Framework Tropea, Greg (Tuesday, 2 October)

brief comments Joel Hedge (Tuesday, 2 October)

Comment on proposed policy Timothy H. Keitt (Tuesday, 2 October)

Request for clarification on specifics and agenda Steve Cox (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patent policy change John Arras (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patent Policy Issues Kent Engström (Tuesday, 2 October)

Sad Kevin Donnelly (Tuesday, 2 October)

RAND Shawn C. Dodd (Tuesday, 2 October)

http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-patent-policy-20010816/ Nicholas Del Medico (Tuesday, 2 October)

Global Standards require Global Acceptance Will Backman (Tuesday, 2 October)

WC3 Patent Policy Cullen M (Tuesday, 2 October)

Response to the response to public comments Jamie McCrindle (Tuesday, 2 October)

new policy bad for everyone Matthew Cutts (Tuesday, 2 October)

Comment on patent policy Simon Green (Tuesday, 2 October)

[news] [ai] FW: RAND is Unreasonable and Discriminatory (fwd) James B. Bushman (Tuesday, 2 October)

Software patents Thomas Zander (Tuesday, 2 October)

Upcoming Patent Policy David Pendell (Tuesday, 2 October)

Require royalty-free licenses for standards Isaac Reuben (Tuesday, 2 October)

Internet Society France against Patents David (Tuesday, 2 October)

Please protect my freedom Hans Insulander (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patents and Standards = bad idea Mark Ross (Tuesday, 2 October)

http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-patent-policy-20010816/ Andrew Oliver (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patent Policy Threatens Advancement Jonathan Kennedy (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patents For What Purpose ???? Bovy, Stephen (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patented Specification hinder development of free software alternatives Raymond Causton (Tuesday, 2 October)

In opposition to patents on the web Orri Erling (Tuesday, 2 October)

You guys must be nuts! Arthur Schneider (Tuesday, 2 October)

This is Wrong... Jeffrey Michaels (Tuesday, 2 October)

No RAND Marcus Duke (Tuesday, 2 October)

Reject this proposal Mc Govern Ezequiel (Tuesday, 2 October)

RF: It's not done until it's done Eric E. Coe (Tuesday, 2 October)

W3C Patent Policy J O Holloway (Tuesday, 2 October)

slashdot discussions John F. Whitehead (Tuesday, 2 October)

Liars and Hypocrites Bovy, Stephen (Tuesday, 2 October)

No patents please Don McCuiston (Tuesday, 2 October)

No Fees in a free and open organization Kelly Held (WTMI Atlanta) (Tuesday, 2 October)

Regarding the proposed RAND patents bac@mailops.com (Tuesday, 2 October)

RAND a bad idea Jay A. St. Pierre (Tuesday, 2 October)

W3C Must Insist on Royalty-Free patent licenses Joachim Achtzehnter (Tuesday, 2 October)

W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Paul Davis (Tuesday, 2 October)

RE: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users Nick Ambrose (Tuesday, 2 October)

Comments on the Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Alan Wexelblat (Tuesday, 2 October)

Open Source Public Feedback on RAND licenses Braddock Gaskill (Tuesday, 2 October)

One Question..... Eric Parusel (Tuesday, 2 October)

RAND inclusion Mark Hackett (Tuesday, 2 October)

patent policy Charles J. Lingo (Tuesday, 2 October)

Avoid conflicts of interest James (Wednesday, 3 October)

RAND-modified: Can a clause o ETERNAL waiving of licensing fees for open-source implementations for RAND? Antonio Rafael Dias Teixeira (Tuesday, 2 October)

W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users Thorsten Seitz (Tuesday, 2 October)

100% Open Standards John Billings (Tuesday, 2 October)

Thank You Abe Milde (Tuesday, 2 October)

patent-response Alan Langford (Tuesday, 2 October)

"forked" standards base Chuck Adams (Tuesday, 2 October)

Entirely Against Patent Policy... astajko1@tampabay.rr.com (Tuesday, 2 October)

comments on W3C's Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Angelos D. Keromytis (Tuesday, 2 October)

My concerns Jim Agan (Tuesday, 2 October)

Don't emasculate the W3C Keith MacLeod (Tuesday, 2 October)

Royalty fees, patents, and the web. Daniel Joyce (Tuesday, 2 October)

On RAND and patents Michiel Toneman (Tuesday, 2 October)

Comments on Patent Policy Draft Andrew Fowler (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patent-free standards Matthew Rubenstein (Tuesday, 2 October)

W3C standards shaped by members' patents sue butler (Tuesday, 2 October)

I am appalled that the wc3 is going to patent w3c elements - whose bright idea was/is this? hp (Tuesday, 2 October)

Comments on the W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Jay Gaeta (Tuesday, 2 October)

When is RAND fair Dr. David Alan Gilbert (Tuesday, 2 October)

Oh. You want to destroy the Internet. Thomas Ritter (Tuesday, 2 October)

Bad idea. Dave Brasington (Tuesday, 2 October)

An open standard is only open if it's free Simon Brooke (Tuesday, 2 October)

Proposed Patent Policy Framework Craig Saila (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patent Policy (Read: RAND) Troy Muller (Tuesday, 2 October)

Is the headline: W3C embraces Patent Office policies? Rodney Smith (Tuesday, 2 October)

Comment on the Patent Policy Framework draft Sam Schillace (Tuesday, 2 October)

RAND Dave MacKinnon (Tuesday, 2 October)

A Patent is not a standard. Standards are Open. Patents are not. Adam Hull (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patents and Standards Niall Walsh (Tuesday, 2 October)

RAND George Smith (Tuesday, 2 October)

W3C Patent Policy Keith Winston (Tuesday, 2 October)

RAND compromise Jim Jewett (Tuesday, 2 October)

Response to Public Comments on Patent Policy Framework Working Draft ed@alcpress.com (Tuesday, 2 October)

W3C patent policy frameword Ian Clarke (Tuesday, 2 October)

Free Standards are the foundation of the Internet Keith T. Kyzivat (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patent Policy torsten (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patent Effects David Callele (Tuesday, 2 October)

NO W3C PATENTS. Open standarts sholud remain open. Stan Podin (Tuesday, 2 October)

Reasonable license fees for reference and free implementations Daniel Barkalow (Tuesday, 2 October)

RAND is Unreasonable and Discriminatory Bob Bushman (Tuesday, 2 October)

patent and standard are contradictory Long, Richard J (Tuesday, 2 October)

freedom? Todd T. Fries (Tuesday, 2 October)

Re: Response to Public Comments on the W3C Patent Policy Framework tz1@mac.com (Tuesday, 2 October)

maintain free and open interoperability P.J. Ponder (Tuesday, 2 October)

comment on patent policy Kannan Vijayan (Tuesday, 2 October)

patent policy comments landon dyer (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patent Policy Comments Michael Frankel (Tuesday, 2 October)

RAND has no justifiable rationale Rich Salz (Tuesday, 2 October)

on Patent Policy Framework draft volodya@mindspring.com (Tuesday, 2 October)

Innovation and incentive do not require patents Jeremy Petzold (Tuesday, 2 October)

no commercial ownership of web mike (Tuesday, 2 October)

Comment on the Patent Policy Framework draft Steve Newman (Tuesday, 2 October)

Re: Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Alan Truesdale (Tuesday, 2 October)

Proposed Patent Policy will not benefit the w Richard M (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patent Policy Comment/Remarks Alex Dark (Tuesday, 2 October)

lawyers & epitaphs Brian Cort (Tuesday, 2 October)

Royalty-free standards Mark Schult (Tuesday, 2 October)

RE: [xml-dev] WWW /= W3C: Has W3C mission changed? Bullard, Claude L (Len) (Tuesday, 2 October)

NO to RAND Bob (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patent Police Heiko Garrelts (Tuesday, 2 October)

NO STANDARDS WITH PATENTS John Robertson (Tuesday, 2 October)

RAND invalidates W3C's mission Dave Reeve (Tuesday, 2 October)

Royalty-free for GPL implementations Xavier Bestel (Tuesday, 2 October)

New RAND policy K Briscoe (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patent Policy - Standardizing patented tech only supports the cor porations Dillow, Barrett (Tuesday, 2 October)

Potential Anti-trust issues with new rulling... Doug Smith (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patent Response John J. Deighan (Tuesday, 2 October)

RAND - feeding corporate greed. Geoff Wong (Tuesday, 2 October)

ciao W3C Xavier Bestel (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patent Policy Gavin Kerr (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patent Policies Armstrong.Steven (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patents within standards Michael Atkins (Tuesday, 2 October)

No patents Roland (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patents and Standards erik_nelson@freddiemac.com (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patent policy comment Ami Ganguli (Tuesday, 2 October)

"Non-discriminatory" patents will kill the web Charles Cazabon (Tuesday, 2 October)

W3C Patent Policy Mark C. Pawson (Tuesday, 2 October)

No. Joe Kaczmarek (Tuesday, 2 October)

Comments on W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Nigel Wetters (Tuesday, 2 October)

Comments Gabriel Gonzalez (Tuesday, 2 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Neil Watson (Tuesday, 2 October)

patent policy Bryan Dougherty (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patent Policy Jason Giglio (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patented Product Lines as Standards. Jesse Klug (Tuesday, 2 October)

WWW /= W3C: Has W3C mission changed? Jonathan Borden (Tuesday, 2 October)

RAND Anthony Watson (Tuesday, 2 October)

Against Patent Policy Framework Michael Hartle (Tuesday, 2 October)

W3C Patent Policy: maybe a glimpse of a bigger picture Paolo Verri (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patent policy Thomas Schulze (Tuesday, 2 October)

patent Karl Cronin (Tuesday, 2 October)

RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents] Bullard, Claude L (Len) (Tuesday, 2 October)

The mechanics of standards mattias.inghe@idg.se (Tuesday, 2 October)

No Rand. daniel smith (Tuesday, 2 October)

REJECT RAND Harald Holtij (Tuesday, 2 October)

Reject RAND David Laws (Tuesday, 2 October)

default to RF instead of RAND Chad K. Bisk (Tuesday, 2 October)

RAND inconsistent with W3C Mission Michael Rose (Tuesday, 2 October)

Do not let patents creep into W3C Nicolas Chauvat (Tuesday, 2 October)

Stop it! Jakub Nadolny (Tuesday, 2 October)

No patent Kilobug (Tuesday, 2 October)

I personally oppose this move Ren Hoek (Tuesday, 2 October)

Versus RAND sea@asplinux.ru (Tuesday, 2 October)

Don't go the easy way Thomas Breitkreuz (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patents vs Standards Flemming Frandsen (Tuesday, 2 October)

I am against the Proposal. CT@braehler.com (Tuesday, 2 October)

Standards Jochem Kossen (Tuesday, 2 October)

RAND and Free Software Erik Sigra (Tuesday, 2 October)

RAND = BAD. Jeffrey Porter (Tuesday, 2 October)

patent policy nonsense. Geoffrey King (Tuesday, 2 October)

Power corrupts.. can you feel it? Szilard F. Takacs (Tuesday, 2 October)

Re: Royalty-based standards Ross Golder (Tuesday, 2 October)

Comment Marek Chmielewski (Tuesday, 2 October)

reject using patents as basis of any W3C standard Nelson Frolund (Tuesday, 2 October)

Re: W3C's Response to Public Comments on the Patent Policy Framew ork Working Draft Anthony W. Youngman (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patent Policy John Gutierrez (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patentpolicy Krzysztof Watroba (Tuesday, 2 October)

Too many lawyers, not enough common sense. Artur Grabowski (Tuesday, 2 October)

Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt Horatio Davis (Tuesday, 2 October)

RAND proposal - obsolescence of W3C Daniel Stone (Tuesday, 2 October)

W3C should not split the WWW Moritz Moeller-Herrmann (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patent Policy Wojciech Dworakowski (Tuesday, 2 October)

Re: Concerns raised by new patent policy / Correction Philippe.Aigrain@cec.eu.int (Tuesday, 2 October)

w3c patent "policy" Paul Evans (Tuesday, 2 October)

RAND Tomek Barbaszewski (Tuesday, 2 October)

Re: failure to communicate Janet Daly (Tuesday, 2 October)

patentpolicy alyson kittle (Tuesday, 2 October)

The Burden of Proof Adam Warner (Tuesday, 2 October)

Personal request Andres Arroyave (Tuesday, 2 October)

NO to RAND licensing Erica Townsend (Tuesday, 2 October)

W3C Patent Policy - can we please rename the W3C to USW2C! Alexander Falk (Tuesday, 2 October)

W3C's Response to Public Comments on the Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Janet Daly (Tuesday, 2 October)

RAND objection Graham Daniell (Tuesday, 2 October)

Time for a new W3C, this one's been hijacked Michael Ellerman (Tuesday, 2 October)

RAND already being assumed for SVG Daniel Phillips (Tuesday, 2 October)

RAND Policy Mr Confucious Say (Tuesday, 2 October)

late comment, PPWG response requested Paul Rohr (Tuesday, 2 October)

w3c standards and patents josh hoblitt (Tuesday, 2 October)

Comment period should be extended Sean@magnonel.guild.net, (Tuesday, 2 October)

SAME! RAND clearly wrong for standards Bob (Tuesday, 2 October)

RAND: This is the first time I've felt bad when pondering the W3. Dave Anderson (Tuesday, 2 October)

patents & standards Andrew Tridgell (Tuesday, 2 October)

Request for extension of comment period Steffen Evers (Tuesday, 2 October)

Current W3C proposal for Patent Policy changes Erik Grimes (Tuesday, 2 October)

Patent Policy Tim O'Reilly (Tuesday, 2 October)

patents Víctor Romero (Tuesday, 1 February)

What's a Standard? Matthew C. Tedder (Monday, 1 October)

Please, no RAND John Eure (Monday, 1 October)

RAND License P. L. Charles Fischer (Monday, 1 October)

extend comment period please Erika Meyer (Monday, 1 October)

Propposed RAND standand Edward Diehl (Monday, 1 October)

America Inc. Mark Andrich (Monday, 1 October)

Fw: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents] David Brownell (Monday, 1 October)

INfrastructure vs Appliaction Thomas Strauss (Monday, 1 October)

W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users Darren Blaser (Monday, 1 October)

Shame on you! More time for comments, and "NO" to W3C-sponsored abuse Luiz Otavio L. Zorzella (Monday, 1 October)

An extended comment on this Web-patent farce Ben Henick (Monday, 1 October)

Patents will break Internet Damien Danneels (Monday, 1 October)

patents Joe.Hootman@bus.utexas.edu (Monday, 1 October)

patent policy Hilmar Berger (Sunday, 30 September)

Ill advised policy George Tucker (Monday, 1 October)

no to w3c patents Jake Donham (Monday, 1 October)

Adoption of RAND license A. Khan (Monday, 1 October)

are you mad? tengu@fastermail.com (Monday, 1 October)

Say No To RAND john.dehope@verizon.com (Monday, 1 October)

Standards are for everybody - not just for companies with an IP-law and royalty budgets nielst (Monday, 1 October)

W3C Patent Policy Recommendations Rod Tye (Monday, 1 October)

patent policy David Udin (Monday, 1 October)

Don't sell out guys... Aaron Dragushan (Monday, 1 October)

privatizing the open standards process Michael Brian Bentley (Monday, 1 October)

NO! to "W3C Patent Policy Framework" NRest (Monday, 1 October)

Firmly against standards 'patents' Ray Drainville / Argument from Design (Monday, 1 October)

Support for Chris Lilley's comments. Against licensing fees payable for W3C Web standards. Jim Caruso (Monday, 1 October)

Regarding patents DonEMitchell (Monday, 1 October)

Comments on the proposed change in patent policy Eric Runquist (Monday, 1 October)

RAND Licensing Sean J. Safreed (Monday, 1 October)

Re:%20Concerns%20over%20aspects%20of%20PPF&In-Reply-To=%3C3BB84832.72C6E0B @w3.org%3E&References=%3C3BB84832.72C6E0B@w3.org%3E Jim Caruso (Monday, 1 October)

Help me understand something... Ron McKown (Monday, 1 October)

My comment. Michał Pasternak (Monday, 1 October)

Patent Fiasco: what the W3C must do Rahul Dave (Monday, 1 October)

Late comment on patents in W3 standards Eivind (Monday, 1 October)

The main impetus for this may be from Microsoft Daniel Phillips (Monday, 1 October)

please don't! David (Monday, 1 October)

Dear Janet@w3.org No Monopolies (Monday, 1 October)

great disappointment peter lin (Monday, 1 October)

please look at the bigger picture! Ron McKown (Monday, 1 October)

Nanotechnology Research funding apocketfullofeuros (Monday, 1 October)

Please don't allow pattented technology into web standards John Fitzpatrick (Monday, 1 October)

OK Janet Daly - Let us SPELL IT OUT for you David Boring (Monday, 1 October)

RAND John Lewis (Monday, 1 October)

RAND - why be different? Gil.WILLIAMSON@syntegra.com (Monday, 1 October)

An oxymoron: proprietary standard Jacek Piskozub (Monday, 1 October)

A clear NO to RAND licensing Hans-Kristian.Nordengen@raufoss.com (Monday, 1 October)

So-called "Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory" licensing IS discriminatory ... Paul David Lukes (Monday, 1 October)

Do not allow patent bound standards! Andy Collier (Sunday, 30 September)

patents vs. open standards matthew.copeland@honeywell.com (Monday, 1 October)

oh for god's sake Eric Norlin (Monday, 1 October)

JOb OPPORTUNITY valeria curzio (Monday, 1 October)

Objection to W3C patent inclusion in standards Todd Stockert (Monday, 1 October)

EXTEND COMMENT PERIOD Joel Norvell (Monday, 1 October)

Data interchange standards should be patent free (at least w3c recommended ones) Bryce Nesbitt (Monday, 1 October)

Keep standards open Nadeem Hasan (Monday, 1 October)

Patent Policy Threatens Technological Advancement Jonathan Kennedy (Monday, 1 October)

patent policy aitken@echo-on.net (Monday, 1 October)

It's too early to change our model Bill Taylor (Monday, 1 October)

Great, just what the web needs... Mike Earl (Monday, 1 October)

patent policy Joe Beach (Monday, 1 October)

Stupid Idea Martin Hauptmann (Monday, 1 October)

More than simply "don't" John Jensen (Monday, 1 October)

Extension of comment period Michael Chermside (Monday, 1 October)

In Opposition to RAND Ron Thigpen (Monday, 1 October)

Definitely hurting the W3C Erik Beijnoff (Monday, 1 October)

Patent Policy Framework Mark Gisleson (Monday, 1 October)

Why did I have to hunt for this list? Daniel Phillips (Monday, 1 October)

say no to patent Priyadi Iman Nurcahyo (Monday, 1 October)

W3C Patent Policy Comments John Bintz (Monday, 1 October)

RAND already damaging W3C imho Marcello Della Longa (Monday, 1 October)

Patent Policy Framework Pantess, RA (Ray) (Monday, 1 October)

A bad policy Ganesh and Sashikala Prasad (Monday, 1 October)

Just say NO! Scott Sesher (Monday, 1 October)

RAND GERALD LANNING (Monday, 1 October)

Problem with a point-by-point response Leon Brooks (Monday, 1 October)

Best prices 4 print sales@alphabetgraphics.net (Monday, 1 October)

Procedural problem Sean Crist (Monday, 1 October)

RAND is WRONG Walt Ludwick (Monday, 1 October)

Re: Web page cfkaran2@eos.ncsu.edu (Monday, 1 October)

Patent policy Ralf Hildebrandt (Monday, 1 October)

Re: W3C Patent Policy Framework Proposal Daniel J. Weitzner (Monday, 1 October)

Level Playing Field sean.odonnell@sentia.ie (Monday, 1 October)

Richard Stallman re: W3C Patent Policy Seth Johnson (Monday, 1 October)

Comment Maciej Arciuch (Monday, 1 October)

I agree with Alan Cox: RAND License on "standard" is not good Peter Hanecak (Monday, 1 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Marcin Surowiec (Monday, 1 October)

RIP W3 Charles Esson (Monday, 1 October)

RAND Patents: A great thing <= So VERY wrong and misguided David Boring (Monday, 1 October)

Regarding the Patent Policy Georg Bauer (Monday, 1 October)

W3C and the Promotion of Fee-based Standards for the Web Vadim Plessky (Monday, 1 October)

Review procedure Jeremy Carroll (Monday, 1 October)

RAND Rob & Joey Knapp (Monday, 1 October)

Concerns raised by new patent policy Philippe.Aigrain@cec.eu.int (Monday, 1 October)

my comments Renard Jean-Marie (Monday, 1 October)

Concerns over aspects of PPF Chris Lilley (Monday, 1 October)

RAND Licensing samleherisson (Monday, 1 October)

Late comment seb bacon (Monday, 1 October)

W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users Alan Cox (Sunday, 30 September)

w3c patent policy changes cimarron@taylors.org (Monday, 1 October)

Against RAND and Patent Policy Framework onno (Monday, 1 October)

Two things phil (Monday, 1 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> webmaster@bexleyshopping.fr (Monday, 1 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> nabucu@free.fr (Monday, 1 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> webmaster@bexley.com (Monday, 1 October)

ambiguity of language don bright's spam buffer (Monday, 1 October)

No to RAND! Patrick Durusau (Monday, 1 October)

RAND Licensing Stefanos Kiakas (Monday, 1 October)

Road rules aren't patented, why should protocols be? Leon Brooks (Monday, 1 October)

Please, no more patent Yves BAILLY (Monday, 1 October)

W3C Patent Policy Framework Comments Matthew Tuck (Monday, 1 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Ceki Gülcü (Monday, 1 October)

RAND will kill the W3C's future James Ewing (Monday, 1 October)

Please keep the W3C standard royalty free Yoann Vandoorselaere (Monday, 1 October)

Patents and standards Roland Kaufmann (Monday, 1 October)

RAND will destroy the credibility of W3C Phil Driscoll (Monday, 1 October)

RF and RAND standard policy Bernard.Snyers@ionicsoft.com (Monday, 1 October)

The well of ideas Phil Howard (Monday, 1 October)

W3C sows seeds of its own destruction. Gene McKenna (Monday, 1 October)

Is the RF license GPL-compatible? Adam Warner (Monday, 1 October)

concrete policy modifications rm (Monday, 1 October)

Patent fees Robert Rhode (Monday, 1 October)

RAND Niklas Hallqvist (Monday, 1 October)

keep standards open der.hans (Monday, 1 October)

RF only, please. Bruce Perens (Monday, 1 October)

Raising the wrong bar Joseph Sickel (Monday, 1 October)

Re: Janet Daley's comments to LinuxToday Karsten M. Self (Monday, 1 October)

patents Rob Helmer (Monday, 1 October)

Just an example Dominique Broeglin (Monday, 1 October)

RE: W3C Responds Theo de Raadt (Monday, 1 October)

No Software Patents David Beckham (Monday, 1 October)

RE: Patents are dangerous to open standards Theo de Raadt (Monday, 1 October)

Patented Standards Mike Todd (Monday, 1 October)

W3C patent policy Richard Stallman (Monday, 1 October)

RAND Patents: A great thing Alex Simons (Monday, 1 October)

Patent Policy Kurt Cagle (Monday, 1 October)

Handwaving Michael Robinson (Monday, 1 October)

RAND patents Robert Storey (Monday, 1 October)

to RAND or not to RAND Rob Saul (Monday, 1 October)

Opposing patent policy Jonathan S. Shapiro (Monday, 1 October)

RAND proposal David Pool (Monday, 1 October)

Patents Have No Place in Open Standards, Period Max Bell (Monday, 1 October)

Please keep ALL standards free of RAND patents Daniel Upper (Monday, 1 October)

Absurd standards Roland Orre (Sunday, 30 September)

LT: Re: Comments on the Patent Policy Framework Frank C. Earl (Monday, 1 October)

RAMBUS Revisited Rick Sullivan (Monday, 1 October)

Re: RF > RAMMED * Deadline extension? * W3C should serve the PUBLIC interest Matt Kennedy (Monday, 1 October)

Why do you want to go here today? Rick Sullivan (Monday, 1 October)

Proposed Patent Policy - The Antithesis of W3C Anna (Monday, 1 October)

RE: Royalty Based Standards Austin Gonyou (Monday, 1 October)

Patent policy: RAND David (Monday, 1 October)

Against RAND and Patent Policy Framework working draft Bruce J. Pezzlo (Monday, 1 October)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 October 2001 16:07:28 UTC