Re: We must fork the SVG standard (was: SVGA 1.0 uses RAND -> DO NOT ! implement it, DO NOT ! use it)

On October 7, 2001 09:23 pm, Chris Lilley wrote:
> Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > On October 6, 2001 04:11 pm, Chris Lilley wrote:
> > > You have not shown that SVG is encumbered.
> > 
> > This document indicates that SVG is encumbered:
> > 
> >    http://www.w3.org/2001/07/SVG10-IPR-statements.html
> 
> I get the impression that you are no longer reading what I write. This
> is sad, since we did seem to be getting somewhere a day or two ago.

Yes, that was before you made it clear that you see RAND licensing as a 
necessary part of W3C's patent policy.

--
Daniel

Received on Monday, 8 October 2001 10:03:40 UTC