- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 11:57:33 +0200
- To: Jason Antony <s1118355@student.gu.edu.au>
- CC: www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org
Jason Antony wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Chris > > According to the W3C list server, it's already the 12th, hope this goes > through. In general the lists are not just cut off like that; the closing date is just the lat date at which a particular working group can guarantee to respond to comments on a particular draft otherwise they would never get the next revision out. > But - thanks for clearing my doubts. > > Will the comment period be extended? On this draft? No, but I think the working group have plenty to read before writing the next draft. > Here's hoping you will take our feedback into account, That is of course the entire point of this list (assuming 'you' == W3C). Also, I should point out that in general, the public comment lists are one-way feedback drops 9the conversation, as it were, continuing by turns - comments, next draft, comments, next draft). In this particular instance since there was so much misunderstanding of both the intent and the actual wording of the spec - plus some very odd statements about SVG - I thought it worthwhile to try and clear up some things straight zaway. I am glad to hear that it was helpful. > and steer the next WD towards a realistic direction. You should watch out for the next revision of the spec, and see how your comments have been addressed. -- Chris
Received on Friday, 12 October 2001 05:57:36 UTC