- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 19:32:59 +0200
- To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
- CC: Jason Antony <jemvai777@yahoo.com.au>, www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org
Daniel Phillips wrote: > > On October 7, 2001 09:23 pm, Chris Lilley wrote: > > Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > On October 6, 2001 04:11 pm, Chris Lilley wrote: > > > > You have not shown that SVG is encumbered. > > > > > > This document indicates that SVG is encumbered: > > > > > > http://www.w3.org/2001/07/SVG10-IPR-statements.html > > > > I get the impression that you are no longer reading what I write. This > > is sad, since we did seem to be getting somewhere a day or two ago. > > Yes, that was before you made it clear that you see RAND licensing as a > necessary part of W3C's patent policy. Really? That is interesting. Can you point to where I said "RAND is necessary"? I believe I said that it was better than nothing. -- Chris
Received on Monday, 8 October 2001 13:33:07 UTC