- From: Shawn C. Dodd <sdodd@jedi.net>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 16:52:09 -0500
- To: <www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OFEJLCFAOGNBGFLMLEMHOEKFCFAA.sdodd@jedi.net>
Hello, RAND-encumbered W3C technology will not be useful to me as a Web software developer. I’ve been working on the server side of n-tier Web applications for about six years now. I frequently recommend new technologies to my employer; hence, I stay apprised of new standards in the works at organizations like W3C. Put simply, I will not recommend any W3C standard covered by a RAND patent policy. Why? I rely on Open Source software based on open standards (like those of the W3C) to provide inexpensive solutions that don’t tie my work to a particular vendor. Patent-encumbered standards not only tie me to a vendor, they make it difficult (and in some cases impossible) for Open Source projects to provide implementations. If I want to pay for a proprietary, patent-encumbered solution, I do so. If I don’t, I turn to the W3C. You’re about to change that. For all the W3C’s faults, at least its reputed openness is real. Adopting RAND policy changes that. Shawn C. Dodd sdodd@jedi.net <mailto:sdodd@jedi.net>
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2001 17:52:16 UTC