- From: Ron Thigpen <rthigpen@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 10:32:43 -0400
- To: www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org
It is my strong belief that all W3 standards should remain free of any patent burdens. The strength of W3 standards is that they are open to all and free to use. The benefits of interoperability should be available to any developer who chooses to code to the standards. Burdened standards are unfair to the developer who does not seek economic gain from their code. Burdened standards quell innovation. Burdend standards are unneccessary, as alternative technologies are always an option. Free standards are superior standards in that they are available to all. Free standards provide a fair and stable basis for competition and innovation. Free standards allow greater overall economic good to be the result of a given innovation. Member companies who seek the benefits of working to a standard should make peace with the idea that the value to their shareholders of interoperability exceeds the value of the licensing revenues. If that is not the case, why do they participate in the standards process at all? A given technology can be either standardized for interoperability or proprietary, not both. For any given technology, a choice should be made. If the owner honestly thinks that their technology has more value under fee-burdened licensing, then it is their choice to pursue that option. We should not muddy the waters by pretending that patent burdens can co-exist with open standards. That this is even being considered is a case of the member companies wishing to have their cake and eat it too. They would like to see that wide adoption and use of their technology that standardization can drive, while maintaining the ability to charge for it's use. The fact that patent burdens may only come to light after the adoption of a standard is even more troublesome. It would be preferable to forego the use of a given technology, than to burden the standard as a result of its use. The resources dedicated to developing alternatives are well allocated if the result is a free standard. Please reject the RAND model or any model that imposes restrictions on the free use of any W3 standard. Regards, Ron Thigpen
Received on Monday, 1 October 2001 10:32:51 UTC