- From: Cartier, Philip <pcartier@hersheys.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 09:21:49 -0400
- To: "'www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org'" <www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org>
1) a 60 day comment period is ridiculous. Even with the web it takes more than 60 days for information to gain general dissemination, unless it is backed by a concerted publicity effort. 2) Using patented technology goes directly against 3 of the 7 principles of the W3C. It should not be done. a) Trust- proprietary methods make it impossible to trust the system. Just witness all the user problems in the software world caused by proprietary standards. It would take many years of court cases to establish what "reasonable" and "non-discriminatory" mean, while anyone wishing to use that standard would be subject to the whims of the patent owner. b) Interoperability- patented technology by definition is not interoperable. Only one method is allowed. A standard must define WHAT happens in regard to the web.. How it happens can be done in a number of different ways, some of them possibly patentable. c) Evolvability- a patented standard will lock in the web to a particular technology. A patent is by definition does not evolve. Any patent holder will fight tooth and nail to prevent a change in standards that would reduce their royalty income. Using patents in open standards is a foolish and short-sighted policy. Phil Cartier ph: 5167
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2001 09:22:36 UTC