- From: Gavin Treadgold <gav@rediguana.co.nz>
- Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 13:04:32 +1200
- To: <www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org>
There is no place for commercial patents, nor any other form of intellectual property in standards. From your own web site detailing design principles of the web (http://www.w3.org/Consortium/#role) "Interoperability: Specifications for the Web's languages and protocols must be compatible with one another and allow (any) hardware and software used to access the Web to work together." By introducing intellectual property to standards, you potentially disallow various sets of hardware and software not to access certain web languages and protocols. RAND goes against the own principles with which the W3C was created. "Decentralization: Decentralization is without a doubt the newest principle and most difficult to apply. To allow the Web to "scale" to worldwide proportions while resisting errors and breakdowns, the architecture(like the Internet) must limit or eliminate dependencies on central registries." Yes, the W3C must eliminate the potential for a central point of failure. The introduction of an IP holder over open standards introduces this possibility. It can not be allowed to proceed.
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2001 21:04:11 UTC