- From: <gregory.d.dickson@accenture.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 16:14:08 -0500
- To: www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org
Dear W3C Patent Policy Working Group,
I'm concerned about the recent Patent Policy Framework draft, which
could allow W3C members to charge royalty fees for technologies
included in web standards.
In particular, I object to the inclusion of a "reasonable and
non-discriminatory" (RAND) licensing option in the proposed policy. I
believe that the exclusive use of a "royalty-free" (RF) licensing
model is in the best interests of the Internet community, and that
RAND licensing would always necessarily exclude some would-be
implementors.
Why would we want to promote an open communications medium that would
require royalties to be paid to a patent holder. The idea behind the
patent process is to protect the creator's intellectual property so
as to provide an impetus for innovation. The forum of the web already
has enough impetus to provide for this innovation without allowing
web protocols, etc. to be patented. This would have the effect of
removing any open source implementations and implementations by small
individual developers that could not afford to license the patent
(shareware or freeware developers).
I applaud the W3C for its tradition of providing open-source
reference implementations and its work to promote a wide variety of
interoperable implementations of its open standards. The W3C can best
continue its work of "leading the Web to its full potential" by
continuing this tradition, and saying no to RAND licensing.
Sincerely,
Gregory D. Dickson
Manager
Accenture
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited.
Received on Monday, 8 October 2001 22:20:29 UTC