- From: Bruce Heerssen <bruce@heerssen.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 10:45:47 -0400
- To: www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org
Hello, While it seems plausible that proprietary formats or protocals could benifit the web, I don't see how including them in core technologies such as SVG could help. At best, a proprietary SVG format should remain outside of the accepted standards for web development - much as other proprietary formats are. Macromedia's Flash, for example, is perfectly OK in my opinion. This example comes from a single company: there is no pretense that it should be included in any official specification, and hence no undue burden for companies to use it. Those that want to can, and those that don't, don't have to. The problem with incorporating proprietary technologies in official standards (W3C or otherwise), as I see it, is that governments often rely on direction from an applicable standards body. So, if a proprietary format or protocol were accepted as a standard for, say, accessibility technologies, I could see a government requiring the use of it for all websites - regardless of publisher's ability to produce said technology. Proprietary technologies often require the use proprietary tools to produce them. Flash is a good example of this. What would happen if Flash were suddenly required for all websites in a given country? Well, web firms that do not have the capability to produce Flash animations would suddenly be out of work, and could even be held accountable for previous work, even if they do not have the means to bring that work up to standards. I realize that this is an extreme circumstance, and a very unlikely one at that, but it does illustrate a point. Open standards have always been the lifeblood of this industry. The W3C's proposal represents an opening salvo in an assault against open standards. If we allow this proposal to become an official recommendation, then surely more attacks will follow and we will be in lesser position to defend against them. Thank you, Bruce Heerssen Web Developer (since 1997) P.S. - the above comments were taken from a comment I submitted to an article found at evolt.org, a leading web development community. The article can be found at: http://evolt.org/article/view/25/16205/index.html
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2001 11:53:50 UTC