- From: John Skelton <John_Skelton@compuserve.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 09:36:01 -0400
- To: patent policy <www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org>
Hi, The W3C's position on patents / business methods should be to avoid the ridiculous and closed-minded position currently adopted by the USA. Please stick only to Open ideas, methods, etc. Do NOT do anything at all which even slightly endorses RAND or similar nonsense. The USA has taken a wrong turning as regards intellectual property. The W3C should set a better example. Historically RFCs have been pretty successful, due largely to being Open, free, etc. Don't change that! So, for example, in the Overview change the last sentence of the final para from: > Where that is not possible, the new policy will provide a framework > to assure maximum possible openness based on reasonable, > non-discriminatory (RAND) licensing terms. to: > Where that is not possible, the new policy will provide a framework > to assure full openness with no licensing terms. I'm not sure the word "new" is needed. :-) I must say I'm concerned that the authors of the Draft do not appear to be disinterested parties. Certainly their employers are not. Regards, John.
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2001 09:38:18 UTC