- From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 20:38:59 +0200
- To: www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org
Here are some details on Apple's patent listed with their RAND claims in the W3C's now-finalized SVG standard: http://www.delphion.com/details?&pn=US05379129__ US5379129: Method for compositing a source and destination image using a mask image Jan. 3, 1995 Here is the summary: This invention provides a method for compositing a source image and a destination image using a mask image to produce a result image in a digital image processing system. The method is, on a pixel-by-pixel basis, using the mask image to select between the source and destination images: where a black color value for a mask pixel selects the color value of the corresponding pixel of the source image; and a white color value for a mask pixel selects the color value of the corresponding pixel of the destination image; and where an intermediate color value for a mask pixel selects a weighted average between source and destination pixel color values. The calculations of the weighted average color value are done in color space, such as on a color component by color component basis. The result image can be displayed or stored for further use. This method can be described in boolean expression according to the formula: result=((1-mask)*source)+(mask*destination). So this is an example of the worst kind of patent: a patent on a mathematical expression. Furthermore, a particularly obvious one that many, including myself, have been using for years prior to the date of Apple's patent. Words fail me at this point. Please draw your own conclusions. -- Daniel
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2001 14:39:05 UTC