- From: R. Ivan Linderman \(best\) <ivan@bkbytes.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 05:16:04 -0700
- To: "'Mail Archives'" <www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 6 October 2001 08:19:05 UTC
To encourage conformance with W3C recommendations, conformance should have as low an entry price as possible. It should be enough that conformance renders one's products acceptable to larger markets. To add a financial barrier for conformance enforces the dominance of W3C sponsors such as Microsoft and Sun Microsystems at the expense of smaller, less wealthy developers. Will there be subsidies for developers unable to pay the full amount? Isn't there another way, such as donations, for the W3C to generate income? Could a "tax" on devices such as browsers or cell phones, or on media such as ISPs or cellular services -- collected like gasoline taxes upon sale -- meet W3C's financial burden, and help subsidize development? Can you imagine the World Health Organization charging a fee for compliance to sanitation standards? Would such a charge encourage or discourage compliance? Sincerely, Ivan Linderman
Received on Saturday, 6 October 2001 08:19:05 UTC