IE implementing WebRTC?
Update of Doodle for teleconf
Chairs' notes, May 20-21 WG meeting
[Bug 25893] New: Offer Answer options should supported sendOnly and inactive media states.
- [Bug 25893] Offer Answer options should supported sendOnly and inactive media states.
- [Bug 25893] Offer Answer options should supported sendOnly and inactive media states.
- [Bug 25893] Offer Answer options should supported sendOnly and inactive media states.
- [Bug 25893] Offer Answer options should supported sendOnly and inactive media states.
[Bug 25892] New: SignalingStateChange event should be fired only if there is a change in signaling state.
Sending very large chunks over the data channel
- Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel
- Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel
- Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel
- Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel
- Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel
- Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel
- Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel
[Bug 25440] MediaStreamTrack.readyState has no muted attribute
Reminder: Disconnect between Streams and DataChannel API models
[minutes] May 20-21 F2F
Isolated tracks
[Bug 25859] New: Streams that become isolated generate errors on PC
[Bug 25856] New: Add way to find out if a MST is isolated or becomes islocated
- [Bug 25856] Add way to find out if a MST is isolated or becomes islocated
- [Bug 25856] Add way to find out if a MST is isolated or becomes islocated
- [Bug 25856] Add way to find out if a MST is isolated or becomes islocated
[Bug 25855] New: Clarification about conformance requirements phrased as algorithms
- [Bug 25855] Clarification about conformance requirements phrased as algorithms
- [Bug 25855] Clarification about conformance requirements phrased as algorithms
What IRC channel will we use?
Starting session early
Fwd: [Bug 25834] close is synchronous& idopontent
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label.
[Bug 25841] New: DataChannel and DTMF methods should check for peerConnection closed state
- [Bug 25841] DataChannel and DTMF methods should check for peerConnection closed state
- [Bug 25841] DataChannel and DTMF methods should check for peerConnection closed state
- [Bug 25841] DataChannel and DTMF methods should check for peerConnection closed state
[Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label.
- Re: [Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label.
- Re: [Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label.
- Re: [Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label.
- Re: Re: [Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label.
- Re: Re: Re: [Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label.
- Re: Re: Re: Re: [Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label.
- [Bug 25840] Creating DataChannel with same label.
- [Bug 25840] Creating DataChannel with same label.
Couple of inputs for errors Handling
[Bug 25837] New: throw error when setting invalid parameters to DTMF sender
- [Bug 25837] throw error when setting invalid parameters to DTMF sender
- [Bug 25837] throw error when setting invalid parameters to DTMF sender
[Bug 25836] New: add note about addtrack being async
[Bug 25835] New: when closing, all outstanding actions are cancelled and their callbacks are fired with a "cancelled" error
[Bug 25834] New: close is synchronous& idopontent
- [Bug 25834] close is synchronous& idopontent
- [Bug 25834] close is synchronous& idopontent
- [Bug 25834] close is synchronous & idempotent
[Bug 25833] New: change the definition of "enqueue a task" as EKR slides May 20
Fwd: Re: Re: Re: Re: Avoid sdp mangling in WebRTC by setting codec preferences - review request.
Tomorrow's meeting - early start possible
[Bug 25828] New: Need to add pc.canTrickle)
New issue: switching sources
- Re: New issue: switching sources
Re: Re: Invitation: WebRTC Interim Day 1 @ Mon May 19, 2014 10:30am - 2:50pm (dcrocker@bbiw.net)
[Bug 25811] New: Change extensible enum to dom strings
[Bug 25808] New: add new acces for the active remote/local SDP
[Bug 25807] New: Avoid sdpMangling by modifying codec preferences through API.
[Bug 25806] New: ice pool size
Re: Re: Re: Re: Avoid sdp mangling in WebRTC by setting codec preferences - review request.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications
Re: Re: Re: Avoid sdp mangling in WebRTC by setting codec preferences - review request.
Comments on draft
Re: Re: A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications
A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications
- Re: A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications
- Re: A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications
- Re: A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications
- Re: Re: A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications
- Re: Re: Re: A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications
- Re: Re: Re: Re: A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications
new DTLS key for call
Finishing off "rollback"
data API retransmission model
Stats Example
IDP protcols
sdpMLineIndex in RTCPeerConnectionIceEvent
creation of pranswer
Syntax of new constraint proposal
- Re: Syntax of new constraint proposal
Re: Re: Avoid sdp mangling in WebRTC by setting codec preferences - review request.
- Re: Re: Avoid sdp mangling in WebRTC by setting codec preferences - review request.
Re: Avoid sdp mangling in WebRTC by setting codec preferences - review request.
Draft proposal for setting codec preferences - draft-guduru-rtcweb-codec-preferences-00.txt
Remote participation
Any plan for zoom capacity in webRTC.
RTPSender/Receiver - The case for Constraints
Agenda for the meeting Tue+Wed
[Bug 25724] New: Allow garbage collection of closed PeerConnections
- Re: [Bug 25724] New: Allow garbage collection of closed PeerConnections
- Re: [Bug 25724] New: Allow garbage collection of closed PeerConnections
Dealing with isolation state mismatches
- Re: Dealing with isolation state mismatches
- Re: Dealing with isolation state mismatches
- Re: Dealing with isolation state mismatches
requestIdentity
Job lot of slides for next week
Meeting recordings for upcoming interim
Updated Stats proposal - May 13
- Re: Updated Stats proposal - May 13
- Re: Updated Stats proposal - May 13
- Re: Updated Stats proposal - May 13
Default candidate pool size
- Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size
Firefox automatically provides local ICE candidates (it does not fire onicecandidate)
- Re: Firefox automatically provides local ICE candidates (it does not fire onicecandidate)
REMINDER: Joint Interim meeting May 19-21, 2014
- Re: REMINDER: Joint Interim meeting May 19-21, 2014
- Re: REMINDER: Joint Interim meeting May 19-21, 2014
[Bug 25497] RTCRtpSender / Receiver objects need to be added to the specification
[Bug 25596] New: updateIce should be called setConfiguration
Next steps on RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal
- Re: Next steps on RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal
- Re: Next steps on RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal
- Re: Next steps on RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal
- Re: Next steps on RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal
DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer?
- Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer?
- Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer?
- Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer?
- Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer?
- Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer?
- Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer?
- Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer?
- Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer?
- Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer?
- Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer?
- Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer?
- Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer?
- Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer?
- Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer?
- Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer?
- Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer?
- Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer?
- Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer?
- Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer?
- Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer?
- Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer?
Re: Re: [Bug 25579] New: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram.
- Re: [Bug 25579] New: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram.
- Re: Re: [Bug 25579] New: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram.
- Re: [Bug 25579] New: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram.
- Re: [Bug 25579] New: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram.
- Re: Re: [Bug 25579] New: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram.
- Re: [Bug 25579] New: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram.
- Re: [Bug 25579] New: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram.
- Re: Re: [Bug 25579] New: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram.
[Bug 25579] New: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram.
[Bug 25576] New: steps for createDTMFSender() are missing.
Re: Security considerations - a proposal
[Bug 25545] New: Initialization of of RTCConfiguration while invoking RTCPeerConnection.getConfiguration should be updated.
[Bug 25544] New: Options attribute of createOffer / createAnswer should be validated before processing.
Re: Proposed Change to RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal
RTCConfiguration and identity
Agenda proposal for DC f2f meeting
[Bug 25533] New: WebRTC spec should explicitly specify the state transition for cancelled offers.
[Bug 25531] New: Validation for requestIdentity attribute is missing.
Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal
- Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal
- Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal
- Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal