Begin forwarded message: > From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> > Subject: Re: [Bug 25834] close is synchronous& idopontent > Date: May 21, 2014 at 8:22:27 AM EDT > To: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org> > > > yes, that is what was meant - we were entering these rapidly as people talked. Basically if close as been called before, it should immediately succeed if called again. > > On May 20, 2014, at 6:56 PM, <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org> <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org> wrote: > >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25834 >> >> Gili <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> changed: >> >> What |Removed |Added >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> CC| |cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org >> >> --- Comment #1 from Gili <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> --- >> I assume there is a typo in the title. Is idopontent meant to be idempotent? >> >> Also, it's not clear what this issue is about (a title with no description). >> >> -- >> You are receiving this mail because: >> You reported the bug. >Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2014 13:56:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:58 UTC