- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 14:05:28 +0000
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25579
Bug ID: 25579
Summary: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections
state transition diagram.
Product: WebRTC Working Group
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: WebRTC API
Assignee: public-webrtc@w3.org
Reporter: kiran.guduru@samsung.com
CC: public-webrtc@w3.org
Created attachment 1472
--> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=1472&action=edit
The attachment gives the updated state transition diagram for
RTCPeerConnection.
RTCPeerConnection's state transition diagram, specified in spec [1], is missing
to indicate following state transitions state transitions.
1. have-remote-pranswer to have-local-offer
2. Have-local-pranswer to have-remtoe-offer
The same is applicable for statemachine defined in section 3.2 of JSEP draft
[2].
This state transitions are MUST to support section 5 of RFC 3262 [3] prack
case.
"If the UAC receives a reliable provisional response with an answer, it MAY
generate an additional offer in the PRACK."
Please find the attachment for the proposed state transition diagram, which
includes these state.
[1] http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/webrtc.html#state-definitions
[2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-06#page-7
[3] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3262.txt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2014 14:05:33 UTC