- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 14:05:28 +0000
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25579 Bug ID: 25579 Summary: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram. Product: WebRTC Working Group Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: WebRTC API Assignee: public-webrtc@w3.org Reporter: kiran.guduru@samsung.com CC: public-webrtc@w3.org Created attachment 1472 --> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=1472&action=edit The attachment gives the updated state transition diagram for RTCPeerConnection. RTCPeerConnection's state transition diagram, specified in spec [1], is missing to indicate following state transitions state transitions. 1. have-remote-pranswer to have-local-offer 2. Have-local-pranswer to have-remtoe-offer The same is applicable for statemachine defined in section 3.2 of JSEP draft [2]. This state transitions are MUST to support section 5 of RFC 3262 [3] prack case. "If the UAC receives a reliable provisional response with an answer, it MAY generate an additional offer in the PRACK." Please find the attachment for the proposed state transition diagram, which includes these state. [1] http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/webrtc.html#state-definitions [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-06#page-7 [3] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3262.txt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2014 14:05:33 UTC