2014-05-28 14:43 GMT+02:00 piranna@gmail.com <piranna@gmail.com>: > In that context, I intended send() == data has gone out of the machine, not ACK. I don't think that is useful. Data is on the wire, and what? you don't know whether it has been received and processed by the peer or not. I would prefer to focus on the send() call that IMHO should never fail, as I really find the current behavior very problematic and error prune. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>Received on Wednesday, 28 May 2014 12:57:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:58 UTC