Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel

2014-05-28 14:43 GMT+02:00 piranna@gmail.com <piranna@gmail.com>:
> In that context, I intended send() == data has gone out of the machine, not ACK.

I don't think that is useful. Data is on the wire, and what? you don't
know whether it has been received and processed by the peer or not.

I would prefer to focus on the send() call that IMHO should never
fail, as I really find the current behavior very problematic and error
prune.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

Received on Wednesday, 28 May 2014 12:57:17 UTC