W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > May 2014

Re: IE implementing WebRTC?

From: Alex Gouaillard <alex.gouaillard@temasys.com.sg>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 00:23:48 +0800
Message-ID: <CA+Gsrje6n0dgqQ0ZtZMQGawuL-UOYqtHdo7bAGZGnmc6=abiaw@mail.gmail.com>
To: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
Cc: Victor Pascual <victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
even if they take another route (*cough*ortc*cough*). they need GUM.
Plus, GUM is not part of webrtc spec, so they still don t support
webrtc, technically.


On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:18 AM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote:
> I know. But how useful is gUM without WebRTC? They could have just
> implemented their own API as they've done in the past.
>
> Gili
>
>
> On 29/05/2014 12:15 PM, Victor Pascual wrote:
>>
>> This is just gUM
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On May 29, 2014, at 6:08 PM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://developers.slashdot.org/story/14/05/29/1429254/next-ie-version-will-feature-web-audio-media-capture-es6-promises-and-http2
>>>
>>> Is this an indication of things to come?
>>>
>>> Gili
>
>
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2014 16:24:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:40 UTC