W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > May 2014

Re: Fwd: [Bug 25834] close is synchronous& idopontent

From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 10:57:33 -0400
Message-ID: <537CBEDD.1050001@bbs.darktech.org>
To: public-webrtc@w3.org
I suggest posting this description into the bug report, instead of the 
email list. Otherwise people looking at the bug won't have any idea what 
you meant.

Gili

On 21/05/2014 9:56 AM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote:
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Bug 25834] close is synchronous& idopontent
>> Date: May 21, 2014 at 8:22:27 AM EDT
>> To: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
>>
>>
>> yes, that is what was meant - we were entering these rapidly as people talked. Basically if close as been called before, it should immediately succeed if called again.
>>
>> On May 20, 2014, at 6:56 PM, <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org> <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25834
>>>
>>> Gili <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> changed:
>>>
>>>           What    |Removed                     |Added
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>                 CC|                            |cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org
>>>
>>> --- Comment #1 from Gili <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> ---
>>> I assume there is a typo in the title. Is idopontent meant to be idempotent?
>>>
>>> Also, it's not clear what this issue is about (a title with no description).
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You are receiving this mail because:
>>> You reported the bug.
>
Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2014 14:58:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:40 UTC