W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > May 2014

Re: Syntax of new constraint proposal

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 19:29:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnU-fvwz8v+Pd0ABuNpfFGqrex=BvzXutHWiR-UgSU0O-A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>, public-webrtc <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 18 May 2014 07:53, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:
> videoCfg = {
>  require: ["width"],
>  width: { min: 640 },
>  advanced: [
>     { width: { min: 1920 } },
>     { width: { max: 2560 } } ]
> };

I've been thinking of "advanced" as "fallback".  The problem is that I
think we decided to put the advanced stuff first, which is immensely
unintuitive to me.
Received on Monday, 19 May 2014 02:30:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:40 UTC