W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > May 2014

Re: data API retransmission model

From: franklin blek <franklin.blek@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 00:26:15 +0530
Message-ID: <CAEmcxLV1MVatVVYbkaY3FLWksu5StkA4UpMqm--E7H9E7LgTuw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
Cc: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>, public-webrtc <public-webrtc@w3.org>
I haven't red that..
In that case we should restrict its maximum length to a reasonable limit.


On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Michael Tuexen <
Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> wrote:

> On 18 May 2014, at 20:41, franklin blek <franklin.blek@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I don't find any specification for length of the label. Then how can we
> judge that it is too large..
> The data channel establishment protocol limits the length to 65535 bytes...
>
> Best regards
> Michael
> > Of course I have to check for other fields as well...
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <
> fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:
> >
> > excellent - I missed that. I’ve been trying to read all these start to
> end pretty fast :-)
> >
> > Do we need to open a bug to make sure we don’t miss the other ones
> Tuexen mentioned or are they in there too?
> >
> > On May 18, 2014, at 2:31 PM, franklin blek <franklin.blek@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > It is already specified in the spe
> > > If both the maxPacketLifeTime and maxRetransmits attributes are set
> (not null), then throw a SyntaxError exception and abort these steps.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <
> fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > If both maxPacketLifeTime and maxRetransmits are set, it should
> probably raise an exception as this does not seem t be allowed.
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Sunday, 18 May 2014 18:56:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:40 UTC