I haven't red that.. In that case we should restrict its maximum length to a reasonable limit. On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Michael Tuexen < Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> wrote: > On 18 May 2014, at 20:41, franklin blek <franklin.blek@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I don't find any specification for length of the label. Then how can we > judge that it is too large.. > The data channel establishment protocol limits the length to 65535 bytes... > > Best regards > Michael > > Of course I have to check for other fields as well... > > > > > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) < > fluffy@cisco.com> wrote: > > > > excellent - I missed that. I’ve been trying to read all these start to > end pretty fast :-) > > > > Do we need to open a bug to make sure we don’t miss the other ones > Tuexen mentioned or are they in there too? > > > > On May 18, 2014, at 2:31 PM, franklin blek <franklin.blek@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > It is already specified in the spe > > > If both the maxPacketLifeTime and maxRetransmits attributes are set > (not null), then throw a SyntaxError exception and abort these steps. > > > > > > > > > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) < > fluffy@cisco.com> wrote: > > > > > > If both maxPacketLifeTime and maxRetransmits are set, it should > probably raise an exception as this does not seem t be allowed. > > > > > > > > >Received on Sunday, 18 May 2014 18:56:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:58 UTC