Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size

On 11 May 2014 17:18, Eric Rescorla <> wrote:
> My personal opinion is that candidate pooling is useful here and we
> should probably leave the default in the hands of the browser. I
> could live with 0 however.

I tend to agree.  The selection of a default seems like a good
opportunity for browsers to optimize.  For instance, a mobile device
might choose to defer gathering until it knows that it needs them;
whereas a device with a good source of power might prefer the latency
benefits associated with early gathering.  No point in us specifying

Received on Monday, 12 May 2014 17:16:11 UTC