W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > May 2014

Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 09:55:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWaDrrVMqm-dyVfi2W4szMeG3Wpz9-2aHJz2M4oq0vSGA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 2 May 2014 06:18, Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree that implicit cloning  is bad.  However it might be worthwhile to
> remember why anyone ever thought it was a good idea, just so we don't miss
> anything.  Was it to avoid the assigment of conflicting constraints/settings
> to the track in the different PCs (i.e. pre-doHickey)?


The idea, as I recall, was that you would be able to do some "extra"
things with the clone that is attached to the PC.  That originally
included mainly status variables, stats, etc..., but it was also
envisaged that it include the things we are doing with
RTCRtpSender/Receiver.
Received on Friday, 2 May 2014 16:55:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:40 UTC