Re: Re: Avoid sdp mangling in WebRTC by setting codec preferences - review request.

It seems it is good to have this API in webrtc1.0.
As kiran said, JSEP spec is indicating that codec preferences is the only
 case that required SDP mangling.

AFAIK, SDP generating today is not indicating m= lines at track level, it
is just like one m= line for audio and that of one for video.
So, this seems to be simple change to deliver in 1.0 and avoid SDP mangling
as discussed some time before in.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2013Jul/0207.html



On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:

> This is a slippery slope towards full capabilities introspection from JS.
> I'm not opposed to that, but it's clearly not in scope for 1.0.
>
> Also, the use of createOffer options to specify the preferences is the
> wrong place. I think the right place for this control surface would be on
> the RTCRtpSender/Receiver object, as that avoids the need for separate
> audio and video APIs, and lets the codecs be controlled per-track.
>
>
> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Kiran Kumar Guduru <
> kiran.guduru@samsung.com> wrote:
>
>>  Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-guduru-ietf-rtcweb-codec-preferences-00
>>
>> has been replaced with
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-guduru-rtcweb-codec-preferences-00
>>
>>
>>
>> Only name change, to make it appear in recweb related documents list in
>> rtcweb status pages.
>>
>>
>>
>> Kiran.
>>
>>
>>
>> ------- *Original Message* -------
>>
>> *Sender* : Cullen Jennings<fluffy@iii.ca>
>>
>> *Date* : May 18, 2014 22:18 (GMT+09:00)
>>
>> *Title* : Re: Avoid sdp mangling in WebRTC by setting codec preferences
>> - review request.
>>
>>
>>
>> I’ve forwarded this to the webrtc group instead of rtcweb as I suspect
>> that is also a good place to discuss it.
>>
>>
>> On May 16, 2014, at 11:03 AM, Kiran Kumar Guduru wrote:
>>
>> > Dear Chairs,
>> > I published an ietf drat related to RTCWEB wrok
>> draft-guduru-ietf-rtcweb-codec-preferences-00.
>> > The intention of this draft is to avoid SDP mangling.
>> > It extends the RTCPeerConnection to allow JS application to set the
>> codec preferences, instead of doing it through SDP mangling.
>> > When I read the JSEP spec, I find that codec preferences is the only
>> thing that requires SDP mangling, but remaining cases we can manage with
>> constraints.
>> > I hope this draft will be very helpful to make WebRTC more robust and
>> will become a working group draft soon.
>> > I request you in person to review the draft and let me know your
>> comments.
>> > The following is the link for the same.
>> >
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-guduru-ietf-rtcweb-codec-preferences-00
>> >
>> … snip …
>> >
>> > Have a Nice Day,
>> > Kiran.
>> >
>> > <201405162033058_Z7RK8XTA.gif>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>