- From: Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 13:25:47 -0400
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Yes, that was my hunch. Dohickeys weaken the case for automatic cloning. One more thing in their favor. On 5/2/2014 12:55 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 2 May 2014 06:18, Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com> wrote: >> I agree that implicit cloning is bad. However it might be worthwhile to >> remember why anyone ever thought it was a good idea, just so we don't miss >> anything. Was it to avoid the assigment of conflicting constraints/settings >> to the track in the different PCs (i.e. pre-doHickey)? > > The idea, as I recall, was that you would be able to do some "extra" > things with the clone that is attached to the PC. That originally > included mainly status variables, stats, etc..., but it was also > envisaged that it include the things we are doing with > RTCRtpSender/Receiver. -- Jim Barnett Genesys
Received on Friday, 2 May 2014 17:26:25 UTC