- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 11:31:48 +0000
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 2014-05-15 13:13, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > On 05/15/2014 11:52 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote: >> On 2014-05-15 11:01, Harald Alvestrand wrote: >>> On 05/15/2014 07:21 AM, Martin Thomson wrote: >>>> This is probably best handled in a room, but here goes. >>>> >>>> A has isolated streams because it thinks it's making a "private" call. >>>> (Scare quotes intentional.) >>>> >>>> B has regular streams. >>>> >>>> A and B try to establish a call. Nothing in the signaling they are >>>> using (SDP, woo!) indicates that they are screwed. The browser runs >>>> the O/A exchange and it seems OK, until the DTLS session blows up. >>>> >>>> Do we want a signal in SDP for this state? I think that it would be >>>> nice. We can put a wee attributey thing on the a=identity line. >>>> >>>> Sorry, scratch that, we can request that the RTCWEB working group >>>> consider this as a new requirement on their signaling work. >>>> >>> I'm not sure I quite get the "isolated" property's properties here. >>> >>> When it was initially proposed, I thought it was intended for: >>> >>> A runs a Javascript app X >>> A wants his media to end up only with B, not anyone else X wants to send >>> it to >>> X marks the streams as "isolated", A checks that this is true (oops, UI >>> needed), and is happy >> This is the key point to me. The only UI we have is the gUM one. > > That's an UI designer's decision. Correct. But the gUM one is the only one required by this draft. > Consider the attached screenshot - the > page dropdown menu in Chrome contains a "media allowed" info entry where > you can remove access. That's another piece of UI. That's a rather complicated UI - difficult for the average user to understand. OTOH, for the very specific case (your second case), it might be OK. Do you see a risk in UI's diverging too much - that the user experience for a service (and perceived and actual privacy/security control) may differ too much depending on the UA used?
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2014 11:32:13 UTC