public-webrtc@w3.org from May 2014 by author

Adam Bergkvist

• Re: [Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label. (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: data API retransmission model (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: renaming updateIce (Friday, 2 May)

Adam Roach

• Re: Update of Doodle for teleconf (Tuesday, 27 May)

Alex Gouaillard

• Re: IE implementing WebRTC? (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: Firefox automatically provides local ICE candidates (it does not fire onicecandidate) (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: Firefox automatically provides local ICE candidates (it does not fire onicecandidate) (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: Next steps on RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Thursday, 8 May)

Bernard Aboba

• Re: Dealing with isolation state mismatches (Monday, 19 May)
• RE: RTPSender/Receiver - The case for Constraints (Saturday, 17 May)
• RE: RTPSender/Receiver - The case for Constraints (Friday, 16 May)
• RE: REMINDER: Joint Interim meeting May 19-21, 2014 (Thursday, 8 May)

bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

• [Bug 25893] Offer Answer options should supported sendOnly and inactive media states. (Thursday, 29 May)
• [Bug 25893] Offer Answer options should supported sendOnly and inactive media states. (Thursday, 29 May)
• [Bug 25893] Offer Answer options should supported sendOnly and inactive media states. (Thursday, 29 May)
• [Bug 25893] Offer Answer options should supported sendOnly and inactive media states. (Tuesday, 27 May)
• [Bug 25893] New: Offer Answer options should supported sendOnly and inactive media states. (Tuesday, 27 May)
• [Bug 25892] New: SignalingStateChange event should be fired only if there is a change in signaling state. (Tuesday, 27 May)
• [Bug 25806] ice pool size (Tuesday, 27 May)
• [Bug 25440] MediaStreamTrack.readyState has no muted attribute (Monday, 26 May)
• [Bug 25856] Add way to find out if a MST is isolated or becomes islocated (Friday, 23 May)
• [Bug 25840] Creating DataChannel with same label. (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25859] New: Streams that become isolated generate errors on PC (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25856] Add way to find out if a MST is isolated or becomes islocated (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25856] Add way to find out if a MST is isolated or becomes islocated (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25855] Clarification about conformance requirements phrased as algorithms (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25856] New: Add way to find out if a MST is isolated or becomes islocated (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25855] Clarification about conformance requirements phrased as algorithms (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25855] New: Clarification about conformance requirements phrased as algorithms (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25837] throw error when setting invalid parameters to DTMF sender (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25834] close is synchronous & idempotent (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25836] add note about addtrack being async (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25834] close is synchronous& idopontent (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25841] DataChannel and DTMF methods should check for peerConnection closed state (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25841] DataChannel and DTMF methods should check for peerConnection closed state (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25841] DataChannel and DTMF methods should check for peerConnection closed state (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25840] Creating DataChannel with same label. (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25833] change the definition of "enqueue a task" as EKR slides May 20 (Wednesday, 21 May)
• [Bug 25834] close is synchronous& idopontent (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 25841] New: DataChannel and DTMF methods should check for peerConnection closed state (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label. (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 25837] throw error when setting invalid parameters to DTMF sender (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 25837] New: throw error when setting invalid parameters to DTMF sender (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 25836] New: add note about addtrack being async (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 25835] New: when closing, all outstanding actions are cancelled and their callbacks are fired with a "cancelled" error (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 25834] New: close is synchronous& idopontent (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 25833] New: change the definition of "enqueue a task" as EKR slides May 20 (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 25828] New: Need to add pc.canTrickle) (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 25811] New: Change extensible enum to dom strings (Monday, 19 May)
• [Bug 25807] Avoid sdpMangling by modifying codec preferences through API. (Monday, 19 May)
• [Bug 25808] New: add new acces for the active remote/local SDP (Monday, 19 May)
• [Bug 25807] New: Avoid sdpMangling by modifying codec preferences through API. (Monday, 19 May)
• [Bug 25806] ice pool size (Monday, 19 May)
• [Bug 25806] New: ice pool size (Monday, 19 May)
• [Bug 25724] New: Allow garbage collection of closed PeerConnections (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 25497] RTCRtpSender / Receiver objects need to be added to the specification (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 25596] New: updateIce should be called setConfiguration (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 25579] New: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram. (Tuesday, 6 May)
• [Bug 25576] New: steps for createDTMFSender() are missing. (Tuesday, 6 May)
• [Bug 25545] New: Initialization of of RTCConfiguration while invoking RTCPeerConnection.getConfiguration should be updated. (Monday, 5 May)
• [Bug 25544] New: Options attribute of createOffer / createAnswer should be validated before processing. (Monday, 5 May)
• [Bug 25533] New: WebRTC spec should explicitly specify the state transition for cancelled offers. (Friday, 2 May)
• [Bug 25531] New: Validation for requestIdentity attribute is missing. (Friday, 2 May)

cowwoc

• Re: IE implementing WebRTC? (Thursday, 29 May)
• IE implementing WebRTC? (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: Starting session early (Thursday, 22 May)
• Re: Starting session early (Thursday, 22 May)
• Re: Fwd: [Bug 25834] close is synchronous& idopontent (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: renaming updateIce (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: renaming updateIce (Thursday, 1 May)

Cullen Jennings

• Re: Dealing with isolation state mismatches (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: Avoid sdp mangling in WebRTC by setting codec preferences - review request. (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size (Saturday, 17 May)

Cullen Jennings (fluffy)

• Fwd: [Bug 25834] close is synchronous& idopontent (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: new DTLS key for call (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: data API retransmission model (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: Syntax of new constraint proposal (Sunday, 18 May)
• new DTLS key for call (Sunday, 18 May)
• data API retransmission model (Sunday, 18 May)
• Stats Example (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: sdpMLineIndex in RTCPeerConnectionIceEvent (Sunday, 18 May)
• IDP protcols (Sunday, 18 May)
• sdpMLineIndex in RTCPeerConnectionIceEvent (Sunday, 18 May)
• creation of pranswer (Sunday, 18 May)
• Syntax of new constraint proposal (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Friday, 2 May)

Dan Burnett

• Re: Syntax of new constraint proposal (Monday, 19 May)

Dini Martini

• Re: [minutes] May 20-21 F2F (Monday, 26 May)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• Re: [minutes] May 20-21 F2F (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Isolated tracks (Friday, 23 May)
• Re: Isolated tracks (Friday, 23 May)
• Re: [minutes] May 20-21 F2F (Friday, 23 May)
• [minutes] May 20-21 F2F (Thursday, 22 May)

Eric Rescorla

• Comments on draft (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Re: Avoid sdp mangling in WebRTC by setting codec preferences - review request. (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size (Sunday, 18 May)
• Default candidate pool size (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: Firefox automatically provides local ICE candidates (it does not fire onicecandidate) (Thursday, 8 May)

Erik Lagerway

• Re: REMINDER: Joint Interim meeting May 19-21, 2014 (Thursday, 8 May)

franklin blek

• Re: data API retransmission model (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: data API retransmission model (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: data API retransmission model (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: Re: Avoid sdp mangling in WebRTC by setting codec preferences - review request. (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: Re: Avoid sdp mangling in WebRTC by setting codec preferences - review request. (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: [Bug 25579] New: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram. (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: [Bug 25579] New: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram. (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: [Bug 25579] New: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram. (Wednesday, 7 May)

George Hazelwood

• Any plan for zoom capacity in webRTC. (Wednesday, 14 May)

Harald Alvestrand

• Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Chairs' notes, May 20-21 WG meeting (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Reminder: Disconnect between Streams and DataChannel API models (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Reminder: Disconnect between Streams and DataChannel API models (Monday, 26 May)
• Re: Updated Stats proposal - May 13 (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Syntax of new constraint proposal (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Syntax of new constraint proposal (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Syntax of new constraint proposal (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: Any plan for zoom capacity in webRTC. (Friday, 16 May)
• Re: [Bug 25724] New: Allow garbage collection of closed PeerConnections (Friday, 16 May)
• Re: Dealing with isolation state mismatches (Friday, 16 May)
• Re: Dealing with isolation state mismatches (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: Dealing with isolation state mismatches (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: Updated Stats proposal - May 13 (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: Dealing with isolation state mismatches (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: Job lot of slides for next week (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: Updated Stats proposal - May 13 (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: Updated Stats proposal - May 13 (Wednesday, 14 May)
• Re: Updated Stats proposal - May 13 (Wednesday, 14 May)
• Re: Updated Stats proposal - May 13 (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: Updated Stats proposal - May 13 (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Updated Stats proposal - May 13 (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: Next steps on RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: Next steps on RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: Next steps on RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Thursday, 8 May)
• REMINDER: Joint Interim meeting May 19-21, 2014 (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: Next steps on RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: renaming updateIce (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: [Bug 25579] New: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram. (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: [Bug 25579] New: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram. (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: [Bug 25579] New: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram. (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: [Bug 25579] New: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram. (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: [Bug 25579] New: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram. (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: renaming updateIce (Saturday, 3 May)
• Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Friday, 2 May)

Iñaki Baz Castillo

• Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Firefox automatically provides local ICE candidates (it does not fire onicecandidate) (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Sunday, 11 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Saturday, 10 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Saturday, 10 May)
• Firefox automatically provides local ICE candidates (it does not fire onicecandidate) (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Wednesday, 7 May)
• DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Wednesday, 7 May)

James Spring

• Re: REMINDER: Joint Interim meeting May 19-21, 2014 (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: Security considerations - a proposal (Monday, 5 May)

Jan-Ivar Bruaroey

• Re: RTPSender/Receiver - The case for Constraints (Friday, 16 May)
• Re: [Bug 25724] New: Allow garbage collection of closed PeerConnections (Friday, 16 May)
• Re: [Bug 25724] New: Allow garbage collection of closed PeerConnections (Friday, 16 May)
• Re: [Bug 25724] New: Allow garbage collection of closed PeerConnections (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: Updated Stats proposal - May 13 (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: renaming updateIce (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: renaming updateIce (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: renaming updateIce (Thursday, 1 May)

Jim Barnett

• Re: New issue: switching sources (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: New issue: switching sources (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: New issue: switching sources (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: Dealing with isolation state mismatches (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: Proposed Change to RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Sunday, 4 May)
• Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Friday, 2 May)

Justin Uberti

• Re: Next steps on RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: Next steps on RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: Re: Re: Re: A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Re: Re: Avoid sdp mangling in WebRTC by setting codec preferences - review request. (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Re: Re: A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Re: A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: Syntax of new constraint proposal (Sunday, 18 May)
• A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: new DTLS key for call (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: Re: Avoid sdp mangling in WebRTC by setting codec preferences - review request. (Sunday, 18 May)
• Finishing off "rollback" (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: requestIdentity (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: Re: Avoid sdp mangling in WebRTC by setting codec preferences - review request. (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: Syntax of new constraint proposal (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: creation of pranswer (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: sdpMLineIndex in RTCPeerConnectionIceEvent (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: sdpMLineIndex in RTCPeerConnectionIceEvent (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: Firefox automatically provides local ICE candidates (it does not fire onicecandidate) (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: Firefox automatically provides local ICE candidates (it does not fire onicecandidate) (Friday, 9 May)
• Next steps on RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: renaming updateIce (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: renaming updateIce (Saturday, 3 May)
• Re: renaming updateIce (Thursday, 1 May)

Kiran Kumar Guduru

• Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label. (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: Re: Re: Re: [Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label. (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: Re: Re: [Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label. (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: Re: [Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label. (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: Re: [Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label. (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: Re: [Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label. (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: Re: [Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label. (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Couple of inputs for errors Handling (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Fwd: Re: Re: Re: Re: Avoid sdp mangling in WebRTC by setting codec preferences - review request. (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: Re: New issue: switching sources (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: RE: New issue: switching sources (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: Re: New issue: switching sources (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: Re: Invitation: WebRTC Interim Day 1 @ Mon May 19, 2014 10:30am - 2:50pm (dcrocker@bbiw.net) (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Re: Re: Re: Avoid sdp mangling in WebRTC by setting codec preferences - review request. (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Re: Re: Re: A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Re: Re: A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Re: Re: Avoid sdp mangling in WebRTC by setting codec preferences - review request. (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Re: A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Re: Avoid sdp mangling in WebRTC by setting codec preferences - review request. (Sunday, 18 May)
• Draft proposal for setting codec preferences - draft-guduru-rtcweb-codec-preferences-00.txt (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: Re: Next steps on RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: Next steps on RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: Re: Next steps on RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: Re: [Bug 25579] New: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram. (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: Re: [Bug 25579] New: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram. (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: Re: [Bug 25579] New: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram. (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Friday, 2 May)

Martin Thomson

• Re: IE implementing WebRTC? (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: Isolated tracks (Friday, 23 May)
• Isolated tracks (Thursday, 22 May)
• Re: Next steps on RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: Next steps on RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: New issue: switching sources (Tuesday, 20 May)
• New issue: switching sources (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Dealing with isolation state mismatches (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Job lot of slides for next week (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Syntax of new constraint proposal (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: new DTLS key for call (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Finishing off "rollback" (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: IDP protcols (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: [Bug 25724] New: Allow garbage collection of closed PeerConnections (Friday, 16 May)
• Re: [Bug 25724] New: Allow garbage collection of closed PeerConnections (Friday, 16 May)
• Re: Dealing with isolation state mismatches (Friday, 16 May)
• Re: Dealing with isolation state mismatches (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: Dealing with isolation state mismatches (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: Dealing with isolation state mismatches (Thursday, 15 May)
• Dealing with isolation state mismatches (Thursday, 15 May)
• requestIdentity (Thursday, 15 May)
• Job lot of slides for next week (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: Firefox automatically provides local ICE candidates (it does not fire onicecandidate) (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: renaming updateIce (Saturday, 3 May)
• Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Friday, 2 May)
• RTCConfiguration and identity (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Friday, 2 May)

Mary Barnes

• Re: Update of Doodle for teleconf (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: [minutes] May 20-21 F2F (Friday, 23 May)
• Re: [minutes] May 20-21 F2F (Thursday, 22 May)
• Re: REMINDER: Joint Interim meeting May 19-21, 2014 (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: REMINDER: Joint Interim meeting May 19-21, 2014 (Thursday, 8 May)

Michael Tuexen

• Re: [Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label. (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: [Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label. (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: [Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label. (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: data API retransmission model (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: data API retransmission model (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: data API retransmission model (Sunday, 18 May)

Paul Kyzivat

• Re: [Bug 25579] New: State transitions are missing in RTCPeerConnections state transition diagram. (Wednesday, 7 May)

Peter Thatcher

• Re: New issue: switching sources (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: New issue: switching sources (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: New issue: switching sources (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: New issue: switching sources (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: New issue: switching sources (Tuesday, 20 May)

Philipp Hancke

• Re: A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Updated Stats proposal - May 13 (Tuesday, 13 May)

piranna@gmail.com

• Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Re: Re: Re: [Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label. (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: Re: Re: [Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label. (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: Re: [Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label. (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: [Bug 25840] New: Creating DataChannel with same label. (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Sunday, 11 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Saturday, 10 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Wednesday, 7 May)

Roman Shpount

• Re: A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications (Monday, 19 May)

Sam Dutton

• Re: Any plan for zoom capacity in webRTC. (Friday, 16 May)

Silvia Pfeiffer

• Re: Syntax of new constraint proposal (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Syntax of new constraint proposal (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Syntax of new constraint proposal (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Any plan for zoom capacity in webRTC. (Thursday, 15 May)

Steev James

• Re: creation of pranswer (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: renaming updateIce (Saturday, 3 May)

Stefan Håkansson LK

• Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Update of Doodle for teleconf (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Sending very large chunks over the data channel (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Reminder: Disconnect between Streams and DataChannel API models (Tuesday, 27 May)
• What IRC channel will we use? (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Starting session early (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: Tomorrow's meeting - early start possible (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Tomorrow's meeting - early start possible (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: New issue: switching sources (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: New issue: switching sources (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: New issue: switching sources (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: New issue: switching sources (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: RTPSender/Receiver - The case for Constraints (Sunday, 18 May)
• Re: RTPSender/Receiver - The case for Constraints (Friday, 16 May)
• Re: [Bug 25724] New: Allow garbage collection of closed PeerConnections (Friday, 16 May)
• Agenda for the meeting Tue+Wed (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: Dealing with isolation state mismatches (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: Dealing with isolation state mismatches (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: Dealing with isolation state mismatches (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: Next steps on RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: Next steps on RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: Next steps on RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: Proposed Change to RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Sunday, 4 May)
• Agenda proposal for DC f2f meeting (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Thursday, 1 May)
• Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal (Thursday, 1 May)

Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)

• RE: New issue: switching sources (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: Syntax of new constraint proposal (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: Syntax of new constraint proposal (Tuesday, 20 May)
• RE: RTPSender/Receiver - The case for Constraints (Friday, 16 May)
• RE: RTPSender/Receiver - The case for Constraints (Friday, 16 May)
• RTPSender/Receiver - The case for Constraints (Thursday, 15 May)

Ted Hardie

• Remote participation (Friday, 16 May)
• Meeting recordings for upcoming interim (Wednesday, 14 May)

Thomas Bruun

• Re: A proposal for returning STUN/TURN server errors to applications (Sunday, 18 May)

tim panton

• Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Dealing with isolation state mismatches (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: REMINDER: Joint Interim meeting May 19-21, 2014 (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Wednesday, 7 May)

Tim Panton new

• Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Dealing with isolation state mismatches (Thursday, 15 May)

Varun Singh

• Re: Updated Stats proposal - May 13 (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: Updated Stats proposal - May 13 (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Updated Stats proposal - May 13 (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: Updated Stats proposal - May 13 (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: Updated Stats proposal - May 13 (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: Updated Stats proposal - May 13 (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: Updated Stats proposal - May 13 (Tuesday, 13 May)

Victor Pascual

• Re: IE implementing WebRTC? (Thursday, 29 May)

Wolfgang Beck

• Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Sending very large chunks over the data channel (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Sunday, 11 May)
• Re: DataChannel: how to know the max size of the sending buffer? (Saturday, 10 May)

Last message date: Thursday, 29 May 2014 19:12:21 UTC