- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 06:45:13 -0700
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 16 May 2014 00:17, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: > What I gather from this conversation is that isolation of streams makes > sense for the point to point case (and, most especially, the X == Y case). > In that use case, signalling of isolation makes sense. Actually, I find X == X more of a concern in this regard, but that depends a lot on your trust assessment. > In other cases, it is harder to see how it is useful; it might or might not. That's right. Securing two-party communications is the primary goal. Multiparty communications requires a little more work, I think. > If we document that this is the intended use case for the functionality, I'm > happy. I thought that this was already fairly well articulated here: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-06#section-4.3.2.4
Received on Friday, 16 May 2014 13:45:47 UTC