I have 10 lines of JavaScript that does the conversion. I do not see this as a good enough reason to reopen that discussion. On 18. mai 2014 14:53:04 GMT+00:00, "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote: > >The old syntax looked something like > >videoCfg = { > mandatory: > { width: { min: 640 } } > optional: [ > { width: { min: 1920 } }, > { width: { max: 2560 } } ] >} > >It’s pretty easy to read that and guess what it means. > >The new syntax looks like > >videoCfg = { > require: ["width"], > width: { min: 640 }, > advanced: [ > { width: { min: 1920 } }, > { width: { max: 2560 } } ] >}; > >I find that much more opaque when it comes to guessing what it does. I >prefer the old syntax to the new proposal. I think we need some >discussion on how to make this less confusing to developers. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.Received on Sunday, 18 May 2014 16:49:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:58 UTC