W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > May 2014

Re: Finishing off "rollback"

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 19:12:08 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUCvGdcrCZfsMjOoBxE+W7LKbz_FgNC7_ys7w6G23keeQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>, Harald Alvestrand <hta@google.com>
On 18 May 2014 10:50, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:
> I'd also like to suggest that we limit rollback to only be valid in the
> have-local-offer/have-remote-offer states, given the limited utility of
> rollback in pranswer states, as well as the fact that we are trying to
> discourage use of pranswer.

+1, I think that a lot of people are implementing pranswer as an
answer with (maybe) some deferred cleanup.  That means that rolling
back is going to be highly unlikely to succeed.

BTW, I think that we've had general agreement for the rest of this for
ages, it's just that no one has actually acted upon it.  Maybe I can
recommend that you send the editors some text :)
Received on Monday, 19 May 2014 02:12:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:40 UTC