Re: Syntax of new constraint proposal

On May 18, 2014, at 1:21 PM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:

> I think 'ideal' will make this less inscrutable, e.g.
> 
> videoCfg = {
>  require: ["width"],
>  width: { min: 640, ideal: 1920 },
> };
> 
> which to me reads even more cleanly that the mandatory/optional syntax.
> 

yah, that is even clearer - but the require things is still confusing. What about 

videoCfg = [
    { constrain: ”width”, min: 640, ideal: 1920 },
];