W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > May 2014

Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size

From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 13:04:44 -0500
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-Id: <FFCA477F-653D-46FF-93CE-4338EA856C5C@iii.ca>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>

I think the JS app needs a way to say what it needs in the way of pool size. 


On May 12, 2014, at 12:15 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 11 May 2014 17:18, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
>> 
>> My personal opinion is that candidate pooling is useful here and we
>> should probably leave the default in the hands of the browser. I
>> could live with 0 however.
> 
> I tend to agree.  The selection of a default seems like a good
> opportunity for browsers to optimize.  For instance, a mobile device
> might choose to defer gathering until it knows that it needs them;
> whereas a device with a good source of power might prefer the latency
> benefits associated with early gathering.  No point in us specifying
> this.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> 
Received on Saturday, 17 May 2014 21:06:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:40 UTC