W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > May 2014

Re: renaming updateIce

From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Sat, 03 May 2014 09:39:27 +0200
Message-ID: <53649D2F.9050701@alvestrand.no>
To: public-webrtc@w3.org
On 05/03/2014 02:06 AM, Justin Uberti wrote:
> That's my preference at the moment. Simple and straightforward.

It's also consistent with how constraints are specified.
It's nice if we don't have to be different just to be different.

>
>
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com 
> <mailto:jib@mozilla.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 5/2/14 4:47 PM, cowwoc wrote:
>>     Or, use a different dictionary for the initial configuration and
>>     updating an existing configuration. The former would have
>>     defaults. The latter would not. Or just use the Builder pattern :)
>
>     Or use the pattern that Justin mentioned:
>
>       var config = pc.getConfiguration();
>       config.iceTransports = "foo";
>       pc.setConfiguration(cfg);
>
>     and leave it to the implementation to figure out what changed
>     (which isn't difficult).
>
>>     Gili
>
>     .: Jan-Ivar :.
>
>
Received on Saturday, 3 May 2014 07:39:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:40 UTC