- From: Alex Gouaillard <alex.gouaillard@temasys.com.sg>
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 12:56:54 +0800
- To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
- Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <E1FDDE68-09A9-49DA-A49D-EDE7873213E3@temasys.com.sg>
+1 Sent from my iPhone On 8 May, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote: > Trying to bring this discussion to a conclusion... I sense consensus around the following: > - General concept of doohickeys, i.e. RTCRtpSender, RTPRtpReceiver. > - addTrack(track, streamId)/removeTrack and onaddtrack. > - Implicit cloning never occurs. This means that if you want to add a track twice to a PC, you need to first clone it. > > More discussion is still needed on: > - RTCRtpEncodingParams > - RTCDtlsTransport > > Therefore I would like to advance the initial, uncontroversial parts of this proposal, i.e. what I describe below. We can then discuss the exact nature of the encodings and transport objects separately on the list, and at the interim meeting. > > // the "send" doohickey > interface RTCRtpSender { > readonly attribute MediaStreamTrack track; > }; > > // the "receive" doohickey > interface RTCRtpReceiver { > readonly attribute MediaStreamTrack track; > }; > > // parameter to the onaddtrack event > interface AddTrackEvent : Event { > readonly attribute RtpReceiver receiver; > readonly attribute MediaStreamTrack track; > readonly attribute MediaStream stream; > }; > > partial interface RTCPeerConnection { > // because a track can be part of multiple streams, the id parameter > // indicates which particular stream should be referenced in signaling > RTCRtpSender addTrack(track, streamId); // replaces addStream; fails if |track| has already been added > void removeTrack(RTCRtpSender); // replaces removeStream > sequence<RTCRtpSender> getSenders(); > sequence<RTCRtpReceiver> getReceivers(); > EventHandler onaddtrack; // replaces onaddstream; event object is RemoteTrackEvent. > // note that onremovestream is not needed, since tracks are 'removed' > // simply by progressing to the ENDED state > }; > >
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2014 04:57:25 UTC