Re: creation of pranswer from Steev James on 2014-05-18 (public-webrtc@w3.org from May 2014)

From: Steev James <steev.a.james@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 00:34:55 +0530
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Cc: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>, public-webrtc <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAB1_PA7EEWCKCXdRdmXbe5fz7zqeh+LpAWey12SxZSmc8AGwEQ@mail.gmail.com>

PrAnswer is added for supporting more of intermediate answers.
It may be required.


On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:

> Can you explain more about what doesn't work? We are discouraging the use
> of pranswer, so I'd prefer to keep it out of the API as much as possible.
>
>
> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <
> fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I don’t think having the JS set the type of answer to pranswer works. The
>> current spec  has the createAnswer returns a normal answer and then JS
>> changes it to provisional. I think this needs to change to have a boolean
>> in the RTCOfferAnswerOptions that indicates if createAnswer should crete a
>> provisional offer or not (default to false of course).
>>
>
>

Received on Sunday, 18 May 2014 19:05:22 UTC