[TTL] Standardizing N-Triples
[TTL] Long literals
[Turtle] EBNF error? (decimal and integer)
RDF-ISSUE-20 (Numeric local part): The prefixed name "ns:123" is legal in SPARQL - should it be legal for Turtle? [RDF Turtle]
ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?
- Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?
- Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?
ISSUE-18: How do we parse "18." in Turtle?
- Re: ISSUE-18: How do we parse "18." in Turtle?
[ALL] FTF presentations
Apologies
[JSON] URI vs IRI
[ALL] Agenda 30 Mar telecon, 1100 EST
- Re: [ALL] Agenda 30 Mar telecon, 1100 EST
- Re: [ALL] Agenda 30 Mar telecon, 1100 EST
- Re: [ALL] Agenda 30 Mar telecon, 1100 EST
- Re: [ALL] Agenda 30 Mar telecon, 1100 EST
- Re: [ALL] Agenda 30 Mar telecon, 1100 EST
[JSON] Consider Exhibit JSON?
[JSON] Objects and RDF
RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs]
[JSON] Related
regrets (at www 2011)
[JSON] fwd JSON Web Token (JWT) and JSON Web Signature (JWS)
RDF-ISSUE-16 (Base JSON Grammar): What is the normative serialization of the JSON grammar? [RDF JSON]
[JSON] comments?
[JSON] Constraining JSON serialization discussion
- Re: [JSON] Constraining JSON serialization discussion
What *is* RDF?
[JSON] RDF collections and JSON arrays
- Re: [JSON] RDF collections and JSON arrays
- Re: [JSON] RDF collections and JSON arrays
initial draft of today's minutes
[JSON] Classifying the use cases
- Re: [JSON] Classifying the use cases
- Re: [JSON] Classifying the use cases
- Re: [JSON] Classifying the use cases
- (emphasising round-trip) Re: [JSON] Classifying the use cases
[JSON] Tiny Proposal
- Re: [JSON] Tiny Proposal
- [JSON] What *is* JSON?
- Re: [JSON] Tiny Proposal
- Re: [JSON] I say again, what *is* JSON?
- Re: [JSON] I say again, what *is* JSON?
- Re: [JSON] I say again, what *is* JSON?
- Re: [JSON] I say again, what *is* JSON?
- Re: [JSON] I say again, what *is* JSON?
- Re: [JSON] I say again, what *is* JSON?
- Re: [JSON] I say again, what *is* JSON?
- Re: [JSON] I say again, what *is* JSON?
- Re: [JSON] I say again, what *is* JSON?
- Re: [JSON] I say again, what *is* JSON?
[JSON] usage example, JSON and RDF I/O in openbiblio
[JSON] Elephant in the room
- Re: [JSON] Elephant in the room
- Re: [JSON] Elephant in the room
- Re: [JSON] Elephant in the room
- Re: [JSON] Elephant in the room
[JSON] User segments update
[JSON] Some general serialization "things"
[JSON] Examples for RDF JSON serializations side-by-side comparison
- Re: [JSON] Examples for RDF JSON serializations side-by-side comparison
Minutes March 16th Meeting
[JSON] data.nytimes
[JSON] Summary of direction discussion
[ALL] Agenda 23 March [FOR EUROPEANS ONE HOUR EARLIER]
[JSON] Minutes for today's discussion
[JSON] The best of both worlds?
- Re: [JSON] The best of both worlds?
- Re: [JSON] The best of both worlds?
- Re: [JSON] The best of both worlds?
[JSON] Meeting TOMORROW Monday, March 21st
[Fwd: Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"]
[JSON] one data point: Anzo on the Web
[Graphs] Fwd: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"
- Re: [Graphs] Fwd: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"
- Re: [Graphs] Fwd: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"
- Re: [Graphs] Fwd: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"
- Re: [Graphs] Fwd: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"
- Re: [Graphs] Fwd: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"
- +blank node identifiers was- Re: [Graphs] Fwd: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"
- Re: [Graphs] Fwd: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"
- Re: [Graphs] Fwd: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"
- Re: [Graphs] Fwd: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"
- Re: [Graphs] Fwd: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"
- Re: [Graphs] Fwd: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"
Doodle poll: RDF in JSON work
Make FTF1 Hotel Reservations Soon
Apologies
draft use case for named graphs from FOAF work
ISSUE-15: What is the relationship between the IRI and the triples in a dataset/quad-syntax/etc
ISSUE-14: What is a named graph and what should we call it?
I cannot connect to the IRC
[ALL] reminder: pls indicate your availability for ftf 13-14 April
Re: [Turtle] starting with http://www.w3.org/2010/01/Turtle/
- Re: [Turtle] starting with http://www.w3.org/2010/01/Turtle/
- Re: [Turtle] starting with http://www.w3.org/2010/01/Turtle/
regrets for the coming teleconference
[JSON] PROPOSAL: Syntax structure should be object-based
- Re: [JSON] PROPOSAL: Syntax structure should be object-based
- Re: [JSON] PROPOSAL: Syntax structure should be object-based
- Re: [JSON] PROPOSAL: Syntax structure should be object-based
- Re: [JSON] PROPOSAL: Syntax structure should be object-based
- Re: [JSON] PROPOSAL: Syntax structure should be object-based
- Re: [JSON] PROPOSAL: Syntax structure should be object-based
[ALL] Agenda 16 March [FOR EUROPEANS ONE HOUR EARLIER]
[GRAPH] Diagram added to GraphConcepts wiki page
[Turtle] Proposals page updated
[JSON] JSON Syntax Options - Datatypes / Typed Literals
[JSON] JSON Syntax Options - URI Properties
F2F Hotel recommendations?
[JSON] Reference, activity streams
[JSON] The case for a triple-based approach
- Re: [JSON] The case for a triple-based approach
- Re: [JSON] The case for a triple-based approach
- Which WG?
[ALL] Raised Issues
[JSON] Clarification on JSON-LD
Re: Criteria for a good JSON RDF serialisation
[JSON] the simple pivotal choice
- Re: [JSON] the simple pivotal choice
[JSON] Reviewing RDF in JSON specs
[JSON] object-based JSON vs. triple-based JSON
- Re: [JSON] object-based JSON vs. triple-based JSON
- Re: [JSON] object-based JSON vs. triple-based JSON
- Re: [JSON] object-based JSON vs. triple-based JSON
Other issues?
[Turtle] Some syntax related issues
Comments on bNode issue within RDB2RDF mapping language
- Re: Comments on bNode issue within RDB2RDF mapping language
- Re: Comments on bNode issue within RDB2RDF mapping language
[JSON] implementation guidance
[Turtle] the Turtle Grammar in the revised editor's draft does not allow comments in Turtledoc
Is it possible to enable LaTeX support on the wiki?
- Re: Is it possible to enable LaTeX support on the wiki?
- Re: Is it possible to enable LaTeX support on the wiki?
- Re: Is it possible to enable LaTeX support on the wiki?
[Graphs] Proposal: RDF Datasets
- Re: [Graphs] Proposal: RDF Datasets
- Re: [Graphs] Proposal: RDF Datasets
- Re: [Graphs] Proposal: RDF Datasets
- Re: [Graphs] Proposal: RDF Datasets
- Re: [Graphs] Proposal: RDF Datasets
- Re: [Graphs] Proposal: RDF Datasets
- Re: [Graphs] Proposal: RDF Datasets
- Re: [Graphs] Proposal: RDF Datasets
- Re: [Graphs] Proposal: RDF Datasets
- Re: [Graphs] Proposal: RDF Datasets
- Re: [Graphs] Proposal: RDF Datasets
- Re: [Graphs] Proposal: RDF Datasets
- [Graphs] BNode scope in RDF Datasets proposal
- Re: [Graphs] BNode scope in RDF Datasets proposal
- Re: [Graphs] BNode scope in RDF Datasets proposal
- Re: [Graphs] BNode scope in RDF Datasets proposal
- Re: [Graphs] Proposal: RDF Datasets
- Re: [Graphs] Proposal: RDF Datasets
- Re: [Graphs] Proposal: RDF Datasets
- Re: [Graphs] Proposal: RDF Datasets
[ALL] Agenda 9 March telecon 1100 EST
RDF-ISSUE-13 (RDF XMLLiterals): Review RDF XML Literals [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-13 (RDF XMLLiterals): Review RDF XML Literals [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-13 (RDF XMLLiterals): Review RDF XML Literals [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-13 (RDF XMLLiterals): Review RDF XML Literals [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-13 (RDF XMLLiterals): Review RDF XML Literals [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-13 (RDF XMLLiterals): Review RDF XML Literals [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-13 (RDF XMLLiterals): Review RDF XML Literals [Cleanup tasks][Turtle][JSON]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-13 (RDF XMLLiterals): Review RDF XML Literals [Cleanup tasks][Turtle][JSON]
- Apologize
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-13 (RDF XMLLiterals): Review RDF XML Literals [Cleanup tasks][Turtle][JSON]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-13 (RDF XMLLiterals): Review RDF XML Literals [Cleanup tasks][Turtle][JSON]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-13 (RDF XMLLiterals): Review RDF XML Literals [Cleanup tasks][Turtle][JSON]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-13 (RDF XMLLiterals): Review RDF XML Literals [Cleanup tasks][Turtle][JSON]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-13 (RDF XMLLiterals): Review RDF XML Literals [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-13 (RDF XMLLiterals): Review RDF XML Literals [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-13 (RDF XMLLiterals): Review RDF XML Literals [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-13 (RDF XMLLiterals): Review RDF XML Literals [Cleanup tasks]
[JSON] Survey for design requirements
- Re: [JSON] Survey for design requirements
- Re: [JSON] Survey for design requirements
- Re: [JSON] Survey for design requirements
- Re: [JSON] Survey for design requirements
- Re: [JSON] Survey for design requirements
- Re: [JSON] Survey for design requirements
- Re: [JSON] Survey for design requirements
- Re: [JSON] Survey for design requirements
- Re: [JSON] Survey for design requirements
- Re: [JSON] Survey for design requirements
- Re: [JSON] Survey for design requirements
- Re: [JSON] Survey for design requirements
- Re: [JSON] Survey for design requirements
- Re: [JSON] Survey for design requirements
- Re: [JSON] Survey for design requirements
- Re: [JSON] Survey for design requirements
- Re: [JSON] Survey for design requirements
- Re: [JSON] Survey for design requirements
- Re: [JSON] Survey for design requirements
[Turtle] Collecting the proposals
[Graphs] Use cases
RDF-ISSUE-12 (String Literals): Reconcile various forms of string literals (time permitting) [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-12 (String Literals): Reconcile various forms of string literals (time permitting) [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-12 (String Literals): Reconcile various forms of string literals (time permitting) [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-12 (String Literals): Reconcile various forms of string literals (time permitting) [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-12 (String Literals): Reconcile various forms of string literals (time permitting) [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-12 (String Literals): Reconcile various forms of string literals (time permitting) [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-12 (String Literals): Reconcile various forms of string literals (time permitting) [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-12 (String Literals): Reconcile various forms of string literals (time permitting) [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-12 (String Literals): Reconcile various forms of string literals (time permitting) [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-12 (String Literals): Reconcile various forms of string literals (time permitting) [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-12 (String Literals): Reconcile various forms of string literals (time permitting) [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-12 (String Literals): Reconcile various forms of string literals (time permitting) [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-12 (String Literals): Reconcile various forms of string literals (time permitting) [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-12 (String Literals): Reconcile various forms of string literals (time permitting) [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-12 (String Literals): Reconcile various forms of string literals (time permitting) [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-12 (String Literals): Reconcile various forms of string literals (time permitting) [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-12 (String Literals): Reconcile various forms of string literals (time permitting) [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-12 (String Literals): Reconcile various forms of string literals (time permitting) [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-12 (String Literals): Reconcile various forms of string literals (time permitting) [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-12 (String Literals): Reconcile various forms of string literals (time permitting) [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-12 (String Literals): Reconcile various forms of string literals (time permitting) [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-12 (String Literals): Reconcile various forms of string literals (time permitting) [Cleanup tasks]
RDF-ISSUE-11 (Reconciliation of documents): Reconciliation of various, semantics-oriented documents with the core RDF ones [Cleanup tasks]
RDF-ISSUE-10 (Deprecation): Look if there are RDF(S) notions that are to be deprecated [Cleanup tasks]
RDF-ISSUE-9 (Complete Semantics): Inference rules are incomplete in the RDF Semantics [Cleanup tasks]
RDF-ISSUE-8 (IRI vs URI): Incorporate IRI-s into the RDF documents [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-8 (IRI vs URI): Incorporate IRI-s into the RDF documents [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-8 (IRI vs URI): Incorporate IRI-s into the RDF documents [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-8 (IRI vs URI): Incorporate IRI-s into the RDF documents [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-8 (IRI vs URI): Incorporate IRI-s into the RDF documents [Cleanup tasks]
RDF-ISSUE-7 (Leftover issues): Leftover issues from the RDF Core WG [Cleanup tasks]
RDF-ISSUE-6 (RDF Errata): Handling RDF Errata [Cleanup tasks]
RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- should we standardize things not yet widely deployed?
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- RDF datasets and graph literals
- Re: RDF datasets and graph literals
- Re: RDF datasets and graph literals
- Re: RDF datasets and graph literals
- Generic "Graph" Use Cases
- Re: Generic "Graph" Use Cases
- Re: Generic "Graph" Use Cases
- Re: Generic "Graph" Use Cases
- Re: Generic "Graph" Use Cases
- Re: Generic "Graph" Use Cases
- Re: Generic "Graph" Use Cases
- Re: Generic "Graph" Use Cases
- Re: Generic "Graph" Use Cases
- Re: Generic "Graph" Use Cases
- Re: Generic "Graph" Use Cases
- Re: Generic "Graph" Use Cases
- RDF datasets and graph literals
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals): Should we define Graph Literal datatypes? [RDF Graphs]
Regrets for next week.
regrets for the next two telecons
Semantics of Qurtle (N3 vs TriG), Graph Literals again.
- Re: Semantics of Qurtle (N3 vs TriG), Graph Literals again.
- Re: Semantics of Qurtle (N3 vs TriG), Graph Literals again.
- Re: Semantics of Qurtle (N3 vs TriG), Graph Literals again.
[GRAPHS] FYI: VoID vocabulary just published
Miscellaneous tasks for the RDF WG (Action-18)
a quick remark about blank nodes
A modest proposal concerning blank nodes.
- Re: A modest proposal concerning blank nodes.
- Re: A modest proposal concerning blank nodes.
- Re: A modest proposal concerning blank nodes.
- Re: A modest proposal concerning blank nodes.
- Re: A modest proposal concerning blank nodes.
Minutes March 3rd Meeting
Turtle, Qurtle, Super-Turtle, N-Triple, N-Quads, Trig - BC and Scope
- Re: Turtle, Qurtle, Super-Turtle, N-Triple, N-Quads, Trig - BC and Scope
- Re: Turtle, Qurtle, Super-Turtle, N-Triple, N-Quads, Trig - BC and Scope
- Re: Turtle, Qurtle, Super-Turtle, N-Triple, N-Quads, Trig - BC and Scope
- [Turtle] Two formats (was: Re: Turtle, Qurtle, Super-Turtle, N-Triple, N-Quads, Trig - BC and Scope)
- Re: [Turtle] Two formats (was: Re: Turtle, Qurtle, Super-Turtle, N-Triple, N-Quads, Trig - BC and Scope)
- Re: [Turtle] Two formats
- Re: [Turtle] Two formats (was: Re: Turtle, Qurtle, Super-Turtle, N-Triple, N-Quads, Trig - BC and Scope)
- Re: [Turtle] Two formats (was: Re: Turtle, Qurtle, Super-Turtle, N-Triple, N-Quads, Trig - BC and Scope)
- Re: [Turtle] Two formats (was: Re: Turtle, Qurtle, Super-Turtle, N-Triple, N-Quads, Trig - BC and Scope)
- Re: [Turtle] Two formats
- Re: [Turtle] Two formats (was: Re: Turtle, Qurtle, Super-Turtle, N-Triple, N-Quads, Trig - BC and Scope)
- Re: [Turtle] Two formats (was: Re: Turtle, Qurtle, Super-Turtle, N-Triple, N-Quads, Trig - BC and Scope)
- Re: [Turtle] Two formats (was: Re: Turtle, Qurtle, Super-Turtle, N-Triple, N-Quads, Trig - BC and Scope)
- Re: [Turtle] Two formats (was: Re: Turtle, Qurtle, Super-Turtle, N-Triple, N-Quads, Trig - BC and Scope)
- Re: [Turtle] Two formats (was: Re: Turtle, Qurtle, Super-Turtle, N-Triple, N-Quads, Trig - BC and Scope)
- Re: [Turtle] Two formats (was: Re: Turtle, Qurtle, Super-Turtle, N-Triple, N-Quads, Trig - BC and Scope)
- Re: [Turtle] Two formats
RDF-ISSUE-4 (Deprecate N-Triples): Do we depecate N-Triples and use Turtle instead?
Re: [Turtle] Misc initial thoughts
[GRAPHS] Follow your graph nose.
- Re: [GRAPHS] Follow your graph nose.
- Re: [GRAPHS] Follow your graph nose.
- Re: [GRAPHS] Follow your graph nose.
- Re: [GRAPHS] Follow your graph nose.
Re: [JSON] Initial comments
bang ! in turtle
- Re: bang ! in turtle
- Re: bang ! in turtle
- [Turtle] Re: bang ! in turtle
- Re: [Turtle] Re: bang ! in turtle
- Re: [Turtle] Re: bang ! in turtle
Re: [ALL] Agenda telecon 2 Mar 11am EST
- Re: [ALL] Agenda telecon 2 Mar 11am EST
- Re: [ALL] Agenda telecon 2 Mar 11am EST
- Re: [ALL] Agenda telecon 2 Mar 11am EST
Re: [GRAPHS] g-box - abstraction or concrete?
Re: Graphs and Being and Time
- Re: Graphs and Being and Time
- Re: Graphs and Being and Time
- Re: Graphs and Being and Time
- Re: Graphs and Being and Time