- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:41:25 +0000
- To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
- Cc: RDF Working Group <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, public-rdb2rdf-comments@w3.org
> Does this propose that blank nodes be identified by a generated > handle? > I think the RDB2RDF WG would prefer generated URIs I agree. Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html On 9 Mar 2011, at 15:26, ashok malhotra wrote: > Michael: > The minutes say: > ivan: RDF WG discussion of standardizing skolemized blank nodes > ... similar issue in RDB2RDF WG > > Does this propose that blank nodes be identified by a generated > handle? > I think the RDB2RDF WG would prefer generated URIs > > All the best, Ashok > > On 3/9/2011 7:11 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote: >> >> All, >> I'd like to ask for feedback on an issue we have in the RDB2RDF >> mapping language [1] (background: this is triggered by a discussion >> we had today in the Semantic Web Coordination Group meeting. For >> details see the discussions referenced within the issue and also >> the most recent thread [2]. >> I encourage discussion on public-rdb2rdf-comments@w3.org and would >> also like to ask RDB2RDF WG members to participate, here. >> Cheers, >> Michael >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/9 >> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Mar/0027.html >> -- >> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow >> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre >> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute >> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway >> Ireland, Europe >> Tel. +353 91 495730 >> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ >> http://sw-app.org/about.html >> >>
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2011 15:42:57 UTC