- From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr>
- Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:34:01 +0100
- CC: RDF-WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Pat, Le 02/03/2011 20:48, Pat Hayes a écrit : > [...] (And this semantic extension is already fully worked out in the named graph paper and the ISO CL standard.) Could you give pointers to this ISO CL standard? I'm interested. Concerning the semantics of named graphs, I don't think the papers [1,2] fully address it. The description of the semantics in these papers is minimal and it only describes what a single graph means. It does not say how to interpret a multi-graph document. [1] Jeremy J. Carroll, Christian Bizer, Pat Hayes, Patrick Stickler. Named Graphs, Provenance and Trust. In Proc. of WWW 2005. p613-622. [2] Jeremy J. Carroll, Christian Bizer, Pat Hayes, Patrick Stickler. Named Graphs. In Journal of Web Semantics 3(4): p247-267 (2005) > [skip] -- Antoine Zimmermann Researcher at: Laboratoire d'InfoRmatique en Image et Systèmes d'information Database Group 7 Avenue Jean Capelle 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex France Lecturer at: Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon 20 Avenue Albert Einstein 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex France antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2011 09:34:40 UTC