- From: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:14:59 -0400
- To: <tomac@google.com>
- CC: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
From: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com> Subject: Re: [JSON] comments? Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:57:25 -0500 > Hi Peter, > >> Is it true that JSON doesn't have any commenting mechanism? > > Yes. Some use fake inline comments (counts as pure data): > > { > "actualData": {...} > "comment": "This is a comment." > } > > ...others (e.g., the New York Times JSON) (illegally) use: > > /* This is a comment. */ > { > "actualData": {...} > } > > This approach works when the data is eval'ed in JavaScript (evil, > don't!), but it is definitively illegal JSON. I find the first more evil. > Missing comments is definitively a weak spot when JSON is used for, > e.g., config files. It was not design to be used in that way, though. Umm, just what was JSON designed for? I would think that "[JSON] is easy for humans to read and write" (from http://json.org) would strongly support the inclusion of comments. > Hope this helps?! Indeed it does, and I notice that all three syntaxes appear to not allow comments. > Cheers, > Tom I must admit to being surprised, so suprised that it has taken a couple of days to notice the lack of comments. peter
Received on Friday, 25 March 2011 14:15:46 UTC