Re: [ALL] Raised Issues

On 10 Mar 2011, at 20:58, David Wood wrote:
> [[
> The process I've seen is that the chairs mark at issue OPEN if (1) the
> topic is in scope, something that they believe does need to be discussed
> and decided in the course of the Group's work, and (2) there isn't an
> obvious consensus already, ie non-trivial discussion is going to be
> needed.
> 
> Opening an issue is essential saying, "this is something we're going to
> be having on future agendas and discussing on the mailing list until we
> have a decision."   By saying that explicitly, it's lets people relax,
> knowing that at some point (before Last Call) it will be addressed.
> ]]

Thanks. That makes sense.

> Please note that there are two other issues at:
>  http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/raised
> which are both phrased as questions.  I've left those as they are until further discussion clarifies whether they should become open issues.  Apologies if that discussion has already occurred; I'm behind on email this week.

My opinion is that both questions should be answered with a “No.”

I also think they're both in scope and deserve further discussion.

Best,
Richard



> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> 
> 
>> 
>> Richard
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Could you please take a few minutes to review them and discuss in this thread as needed?  Thanks.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Dave
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:46:59 UTC