- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:44:07 +0000
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- CC: Alex Hall <alexhall@revelytix.com>, Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Pat Hayes wrote: > No, our task is to write a specification document for RDF. "Best practices" do not cut it. I agree, however would like to note that we are writing the specification, so we can define it how we need to, so long as it remains JSON compatible, which as per the media type registration, is just a syntax, and /not/ an Internet Standard. [ Network Working Group D. Crockford Request for Comments: 4627 JSON.org Category: Informational July 2006 The application/json Media Type for JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Status of This Memo This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. ] So, perhaps we need to define what we need to be compatible with, and what we can normatively reference. ECMAScript-262 v5, ISO/IEC 16262, rfc4627?
Received on Thursday, 24 March 2011 19:45:18 UTC