- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:23:46 +0000
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- CC: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Andy Seaborne wrote: > On 01/03/11 16:41, Nathan wrote: >> actually ^ may be better.. such that >> >> :a :b :c . >> >> could be written as: >> >> :c ^:b :a . >> >> meaning >> >> :c [ owl:inverseOf :b ] :a . > > meaning there is a there is bnode in the predicate position. > >> >> meaning: >> >> :a :b :c . >> > > SPARQL has: > > :c ^:b :a . > > meaning > > :a :b :c > > reverses subject and object. The matching process really does swap > subject and object. > > http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#propertypaths wouldn't that require subjects as literals?
Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2011 17:24:38 UTC