- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:55:35 +0000
- To: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>
- CC: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4D89FBD7.6010100@epimorphics.com>
On 23/03/11 13:21, Thomas Steiner wrote: > Hi all, > > As per ACTION-20 (http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/20) I am > to create a side-by-side comparison table for the proposed RDF JSON > serializations so far. I have come up with two examples, one basic, > and one advanced example, and wanted to get your feedback on the > samples. Are they complex enough? Do they miss an RDF feature you > would like to see covered? Are they too real-world-ish or too > theoretic? Please feel free to edit/add your feedback on the Wiki > section: > > => http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-JSON#Sample_Graphs<= > > I will take whatever we have agreed on by Saturday, and try to convert > the two examples in a couple of JSON docs. > > Best, > Tom > Real world is more useful in seeing what the options might look like - I've tried here to write out all the features I can think of as synthetic test data for coverage. @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . @prefix : <http://example/> . :x1 :p1 1 ; :p2 1.0 ; :p3 1.0e0 ; :p4 () ; :p5 (1 2 "three" ) ; :p6 [ :q 57 ; :q 89 ] ; :p7 _:a . _:a :p1 :z ; :p2 "str" ; :p3 "str"^^xsd:string . [] :p :z . :z rdfs:label "Swansea"@en , "Abertawe"@cy ; :q1 "2011-03-23T13:40:22.489+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ; :q2 "2011-03-23Z"^^xsd:date ; :q3 "2011-03-23"^^xsd:date ; :q4 "2011+01:00"^^xsd:gYear ; :q5 "2011"^^xsd:gYear . ("a" "b" "c" ) :p [ :p (1 2) , (3 4) ] . [ :p (1 2) , (3 4) ] :p ("a" "b" "c" ) . # These are not strict Turtle where everything # must be "subject-predicate" form. # They are SPARQL. ("a" "b" "c" ) . [ :p (1 2) , (3 4) ] . Attached: D.ttl (the data above) D.nt (converted to N-triples) Andy
Attachments
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2011 13:56:31 UTC